Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA barcoding for ecologists

Valentini, Alice, Pompanon, François, Taberlet, Pierre·2009·Trends in Ecology & Evolution
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Floyd, 2002, Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification, Mol. Ecol., 11, 839, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01485.x · DOI
  2. Hebert, 2003, Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species, Proc. Biol. Sci., 270, S96, 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hebert, 2005, The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy, Syst. Biol., 54, 852, 10.1080/10635150500354886 · DOI
  4. Arnot, 1993, Digital codes from hypervariable tandemly repeated DNA sequences in the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite gene can genetically barcode isolates, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 61, 15, 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90154-P · DOI
  5. Kangethe, 1982, Identification of the species origin of fresh meat using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent-assay procedure, Meat Sci., 7, 229, 10.1016/0309-1740(82)90088-2 · DOI
  6. Kress, 2005, Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 8369, 10.1073/pnas.0503123102 · DOI
  7. Lahaye, 2008, DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 105, 2923, 10.1073/pnas.0709936105 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kress, 2007, A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region, PLoS ONE, 2, e508, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000508 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chase, 2007, A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants, Taxon, 56, 295, 10.1002/tax.562004 · DOI
  10. Chase, 2005, Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 360, 1889, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1720 · DOI
  11. Harris, 2003, Can you bank on GenBank?, Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 317, 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00150-2 · DOI
  12. Ratnasingham, 2007, BOLD: the barcode of life data system (www.barcodinglife.org), Mol. Ecol. Notes, 7, 355, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Knowlton, 1993, Sibling species in the sea, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 24, 189, 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001201 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ahrens, 2007, DNA-based taxonomy for associating adults and larvae in multi-species assemblages of chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 44, 436, 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.02.024 · DOI
  15. Rubinoff, 2006, Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation, Conserv. Biol., 20, 1026, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00372.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Neher, 2001, Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators, J. Nematol., 33, 161
  17. Bhadury, 2006, Development and evaluation of a DNA-barcoding approach for the rapid identification of nematodes, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 320, 1, 10.3354/meps320001 · DOI
  18. Powers, 2004, Nematode molecular diagnostics: from bands to barcodes, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 42, 367, 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140348 · DOI
  19. Valière, 2003, Long distance wolf recolonization of France and Switzerland inferred from non-invasive genetic sampling over a period of 10 years, Anim. Conserv., 6, 83, 10.1017/S1367943003003111 · DOI
  20. Sugimoto, 2006, Species and sex identification from faecal samples of sympatric carnivores, Amur leopard and Siberian tiger, in the Russian Far East, Conserv. Genet., 7, 799, 10.1007/s10592-005-9071-z · DOI
  21. Pfenninger, 2007, Utility of DNA taxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species, Mol. Ecol., 16, 1957, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03136.x · DOI
  22. Tedersoo, 2007, Ectomycorrhizal fungi of the Seychelles: diversity patterns and host shifts from the native Vateriopsis seychellarum (Dipterocarpaceae) and Intsia bijuga (Caesalpiniaceae) to the introduced Eucalyptus robusta (Myrtaceae), but not Pinus caribea (Pinaceae), New Phytol., 175, 321, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02104.x · DOI
  23. Smith, 2006, DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 3657, 10.1073/pnas.0511318103 · DOI
  24. Smith, 2007, DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 4967, 10.1073/pnas.0700050104 · DOI
  25. Berkov, 2002, The impact of redefined species limits in Palame (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Acanthocinini) on assessments of host, seasonal, and stratum specificity, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 76, 195, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02082.x · DOI
  26. Domingo-Roura, 2006, Badger hair in shaving brushes comes from protected Eurasian badgers, Biol. Conserv., 128, 425, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.013 · DOI
  27. Lee, 2006, DNA profiling of shahtoosh, Electrophoresis, 27, 3359, 10.1002/elps.200600062 · DOI
  28. Teletchea, 2008, Molecular identification of vertebrate species by oligonucleotide microarray in food and forensic samples, J. Appl. Ecol., 45, 967, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01415.x · DOI
  29. Birstein, 2000, Polyphyly of mtDNA lineages in the Russian sturgeon, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii: forensic and evolutionary implications, Conserv. Genet., 1, 81, 10.1023/A:1010141906100 · DOI
  30. Assefa, 2007, DNA identification of Busseola (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae in Ethiopian sugarcane, Afr. Entomol., 15, 375, 10.4001/1021-3589-15.2.375 · DOI
  31. Ficetola, 2008, Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples, Biol. Lett., 4, 423, 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 · DOI
  32. Gaston, 2004, Automated species identification: why not?, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 359, 655, 10.1098/rstb.2003.1442 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Gotelli, 2004, A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 359, 585, 10.1098/rstb.2003.1443 · DOI
  34. Hajibabaei, 2005, Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 360, 1959, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1727 · DOI
  35. Cameron, 2006, Who will actually use DNA barcoding and what will it cost?, Syst. Biol., 55, 844, 10.1080/10635150600960079 · DOI
  36. Janzen, 2005, Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 360, 1835, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1715 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sogin, 2006, Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 12115, 10.1073/pnas.0605127103 · DOI
  38. Rusch, 2007, The Sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific, PLoS Biol., 5, e77, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050077 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Blaxter, 2005, Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 360, 1935, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1725 · DOI
  40. Herrera, 2007, Species richness and phylogenetic diversity comparisons of soil microbial communities affected by nickel-mining and revegetation efforts in New Caledonia, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 43, 130, 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.12.001 · DOI
  41. Oline, 2006, Phylogenetic comparisons of bacterial communities from serpentine and nonserpentine soils, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72, 6965, 10.1128/AEM.00690-06 · DOI
  42. Gomez-Alvarez, 2007, Comparative bacterial diversity in recent Hawaiian volcanic deposits of different ages, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 60, 60, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00253.x · DOI
  43. Blackwood, 2007, Interpreting ecological diversity indices applied to terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data: insights from simulated microbial communities, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73, 5276, 10.1128/AEM.00514-07 · DOI
  44. Matz, 2005, A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence data, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 360, 1969, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1728 · DOI
  45. Nielsen, 2006, Statistical approaches for DNA barcoding, Syst. Biol., 55, 162, 10.1080/10635150500431239 · DOI
  46. Hickerson, 2006, DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space, Syst. Biol., 55, 729, 10.1080/10635150600969898 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Willerslev, 2003, Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments, Science, 300, 791, 10.1126/science.1084114 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Willerslev, 2007, Ancient biomolecules from deep ice cores reveal a forested southern Greenland, Science, 317, 111, 10.1126/science.1141758 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kuch, 2002, Molecular analysis of a 11 700-year-old rodent midden from the Atacama Desert, Chile, Mol. Ecol., 11, 913, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01492.x · DOI
  50. Hofreiter, 2000, A molecular analysis of ground sloth diet through the last glaciation, Mol. Ecol., 9, 1975, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.01106.x · DOI
  51. Rollo, 2002, Otzi's last meals: DNA analysis of the intestinal content of the Neolithic glacier mummy from the Alps, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 12594, 10.1073/pnas.192184599 · DOI
  52. Marrero, 2004, Diet of the endemic Madeira Laurel Pigeon Columba trocaz in agricultural and forest areas: implications for conservation, Bird Conserv. Int., 14, 165, 10.1017/S0959270904000218 · DOI
  53. Cristobal-Azkarate, 2007, Diet and activity pattern of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico: effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation, Am. J. Primatol., 69, 1013, 10.1002/ajp.20420 · DOI
  54. Agusti, 2003, Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers, Mol. Ecol., 12, 3467, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02014.x · DOI
  55. Passmore, 2006, DNA as a dietary biomarker in Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, Mar. Biotechnol., 8, 686, 10.1007/s10126-005-6088-8 · DOI
  56. Deagle, 2005, Genetic screening for prey in the gut contents from a giant squid (Architeuthis sp.), J. Hered., 96, 417, 10.1093/jhered/esi036 · DOI
  57. Blankenship, 2005, Universal primers and PCR of gut contents to study marine invertebrate diets, Mol. Ecol., 14, 891, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02448.x · DOI
  58. Pons, 2006, DNA-based identification of preys from non-destructive, total DNA extractions of predators using arthropod universal primers, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6, 623, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01353.x · DOI
  59. Symondson, 2002, Molecular identification of prey in predator diets, Mol. Ecol., 11, 627, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01471.x · DOI · Paper page
  60. Jarman, 2004, Group-specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based analysis of species diversity and identity in dietary samples, Mol. Ecol., 13, 1313, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02109.x · DOI
  61. Bradley, 2007, Plant DNA sequences from feces: potential means for assessing diets of wild primates, Am. J. Primatol., 69, 699, 10.1002/ajp.20384 · DOI
  62. Nystrom, 2006, Effect of local prey availability on gyrfalcon diet: DNA analysis on ptarmigan remains at nest sitesm, J. Zool. (Lond.), 269, 57, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00050.x · DOI
  63. Deagle, 2007, Studying seabird diet through genetic analysis of feces: a case study on Macaroni penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus), PLoS ONE, 2, e831, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000831 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Taberlet, 2007, Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, e14, 10.1093/nar/gkl938 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Valentini, A. et al. New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach. Mol. Ecol. Res. (in press)
  66. Ballard, 2004, The incomplete natural history of mitochondria, Mol. Ecol., 13, 729, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02063.x · DOI · Paper page
  67. Zhang, 1996, Highly conserved nuclear copies of the mitochondrial control region in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria: some implications for population studies, Mol. Ecol., 5, 295, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1996.00078.x · DOI
  68. Kmiec, 2006, Heteroplasmy as a common state of mitochondrial genetic information in plants and animals, Curr. Genet., 50, 149, 10.1007/s00294-006-0082-1 · DOI
  69. Vences, 2005, Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 360, 1859, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1717 · DOI
  70. Deagle, 2006, Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples – a case study on DNA in faeces, Front. Zool., 3, 11, 10.1186/1742-9994-3-11 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Hajibabaei, 2006, A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6, 959, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01470.x · DOI · Paper page
  72. Meusnier, 2008, A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis, BMC Genomics, 9, 214, 10.1186/1471-2164-9-214 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Hajibabaei, 2007, DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics, Trends Genet., 23, 167, 10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Manel, 2005, Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques, Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 136, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.12.004 · DOI
  75. Zinger, 2008, CE-SSCP and CE-FLA, simple and high-throughput alternatives for fungal diversity studies, J. Microbiol. Methods, 72, 42, 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.10.005 · DOI
  76. Hudson, 2008, Sequencing breakthroughs for genomic ecology and evolutionary biology, Mol. Ecol. Res., 8, 3, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02019.x · DOI · Paper page
  77. Schuster, 2008, Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology, Nat. Methods, 5, 16, 10.1038/nmeth1156 · DOI
  78. Margulies, 2005, Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors, Nature, 437, 376, 10.1038/nature03959 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,122

Metadata

Authors
Valentini, A., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
110-117
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011
OpenAlex
W2101658538
Cited by
1,122
References
2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA barcoding for ecologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011
The paper
Valentini, A., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. (2009). DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.