The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification
Open accessAbstract
Comparison of the sequences of conserved genes, most commonly those encoding 16S rRNA, is used for bacterial genotypic identification. Among some taxa, such as the Enterobacteriaceae, variation within this gene does not allow confident species identification. We investigated the usefulness of RNA polymerase beta‐subunit encoding gene (rpoB ) sequences as an alternative tool for universal bacterial genotypic identification. We generated a database of partial rpoB for 14 Enterobacteriaceae species and then assessed the intra‐ and interspecies divergence between the rpoB and the 16S rRNA genes by pairwise comparisons. We found that levels of divergence between the rpoB sequences of different strains were markedly higher than those between their 16S rRNA genes. This higher discriminatory power was further confirmed by assigning 20 blindly selected clinical isolates to the correct enteric species on the basis of rpoB sequence comparison. Comparison of rpoB sequences from Enterobacteriaceae was also used as the basis for their phylogenetic analysis and demonstrated the genus Klebsiella to be polyphyletic. The trees obtained with rpoB were more compatible with the currently accepted classification of Enterobacteriaceae than those obtained with 16S rRNA. These data indicate that rpoB is a powerful identification tool, which may be useful for universal bacterial identification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Cited by
rpoB Gene Sequence-Based Identification of Staphylococcu s Species
Drancourt, M., & Raoult, D. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.40.4.1333-1338.2002 · Cited by 309
Self-citationPopulation Genetics of the Nomenspecies Enterobacter cloacae
Hoffmann, H., & Roggenkamp, A. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.9.5306-5318.2003 · Cited by 306
Boers, S. A., Jansen, R., & Hays, J. P. (2019) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/s10096-019-03520-3 · Cited by 283
The Microbial Diversity of Traditional Spontaneously Fermented Lambic Beer
Spitaels, F., Wieme, A. D., Janssens, M., Aerts, M., Daniel, H.-M., Van Landschoot, A., De Vuyst, L., & Vandamme, P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095384 · Cited by 265
Comparative Molecular and Microbiologic Diagnosis of Bacterial Endocarditis
(2003) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0912.030229 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Mollet, C., Drancourt, M., & Raoult, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1005-1011
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2149021569
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6382009.x
- The paper
- Mollet, C., Drancourt, M., & Raoult, D. (1997). rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6382009.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.