The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simple sequence repeats in the Helicobacter pylori genome
Open accessAbstract
We describe an integrated system for the analysis of DNA sequence motifs within complete bacterial genome sequences. This system is based around ACeDB, a genome database with an integrated graphical user interface; we identify and display motifs in the context of genetic, sequence and bibliographic data. Tomb et al. (1997) previously reported the identification of contingency genes in Helicobacter pylori through their association with homopolymeric tracts and dinucleotide repeats. With this as a starting point, we validated the system by a search for this type of repeat and used the contextual information to assess the likelihood that they mediate phase variation in the associated open reading frames (ORFs). We found all of the repeats previously described, and identified 27 putative phase‐variable genes (including 17 previously described). These could be divided into three groups: lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis, cell‐surface‐associated proteins and DNA restriction/modification systems. Five of the putative genes did not have obvious homologues in any of the public domain sequence databases. The reading frame of some ORFs was disrupted by the presence of the repeats, including the alpha(1‐2) fucosyltransferase gene, necessary for the synthesis of the Lewis Y epitope. An additional benefit of this approach is that the results of each search can be analysed further and compared with those from other genomes. This revealed that H. pylori has an unusually high frequency of homopurine:homopyrimidine repeats suggesting mechanistic biases that favour their presence and instability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori
Tomb, J.-F., White, O., Kerlavage, A. R., Clayton, R. A., Sutton, G. G., Fleischmann, R. D., Ketchum, K. A., Klenk, H. P., Gill, S., Dougherty, B. A., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41483 · Cited by 3,529
Cited by
Alm, R. A., Ling, L.-S. L., Moir, D. T., King, B. L., Brown, E. D., Doig, P. C., Smith, D. R., Noonan, B., Guild, B. C., deJonge, B. L., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/16495 · Cited by 1,893
The phage‐host arms race: Shaping the evolution of microbes
Stern, A., & Sorek, R. (2011) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000071 · Cited by 527
Kobayashi, I. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.18.3742 · Cited by 513
The physiology of Campylobacter species and its relevance to their role as foodborne pathogens
Park, S. F. (2002) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00678-x · Cited by 451
Kong, H. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.17.3216 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Saunders, N. J., Peden, J. F., Hood, D. W., & Moxon, E. R.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1091-1098
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W1993023516
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simple sequence repeats in the Helicobacter pylori genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00768.x
- The paper
- Saunders, N. J., Peden, J. F., Hood, D. W., & Moxon, E. R. (1998). Simple sequence repeats in the Helicobacter pylori genome. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00768.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.