The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The macrolide–ketolide antibiotic binding site is formed by structures in domains II and V of 23S ribosomal RNA
Open accessAbstract
The macrolide antibiotic erythromycin interacts with bacterial 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) making contacts that are limited to hairpin 35 in domain II of the rRNA and to the peptidyl transferase loop in domain V. These two regions are probably folded close together in the 23S rRNA tertiary structure and form a binding pocket for macrolides and other drug types. Erythromycin has been derivatized by replacing the L‐cladinose moiety at position 3 by a keto group (forming the ketolide antibiotics) and by an alkyl‐aryl extension at positions 11/12 of the lactone ring. All the drugs footprint identically within the peptidyl transferase loop, giving protection against chemical modification at A2058, A2059 and G2505, and enhancing the accessibility of A2062. However, the ketolide derivatives bind to ribosomes with widely varying affinities compared with erythromycin. This variation correlates with differences in the hairpin 35 footprints. Erythromycin enhances the modification at position A752. Removal of cladinose lowers drug binding 70‐fold, with concomitant loss of the A752 footprint. However, the 11/12 extension strengthens binding 10‐fold, and position A752 becomes protected. These findings indicate how drug derivatization can improve the inhibition of bacteria that have macrolide resistance conferred by changes in the peptidyl transferase loop.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Binding sites of the antibiotics pactamycin and celesticetin on ribosomal RNAs
Egebjerg, J., & Garrett, R. A. (1991) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/0300-9084(91)90158-w · Cited by 36
Cited by
Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat microbial resistance
Pelgrift, R. Y., & Friedman, A. J. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.011 · Cited by 1,432
The bacterial ribosome as a target for antibiotics
Poehlsgaard, J., & Douthwaite, S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1265 · Cited by 607
Self-citationTu, D., Blaha, G., Moore, P. B., & Steitz, T. A. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.005 · Cited by 433
The A-Z of bacterial translation inhibitors
Wilson, D. N. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409230903307311 · Cited by 322
Revisiting the structures of several antibiotics bound to the bacterial ribosome
Bulkley, D., Innis, C. A., Blaha, G., & Steitz, T. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008685107 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, L. H., Mauvais, P., & Douthwaite, S.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 623-631
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2043158848
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The macrolide–ketolide antibiotic binding site is formed by structures in domains II and V of 23S ribosomal RNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01202.x
- The paper
- Hansen, L. H., Mauvais, P., & Douthwaite, S. (1999). The macrolide–ketolide antibiotic binding site is formed by structures in domains II and V of 23S ribosomal RNA. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01202.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.