Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative proteome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG strains: towards functional genomics of microbial pathogens

Jungblut, P. R., Schaible, U. E., Mollenkopf, H.‐J., Zimny‐Arndt, U., Raupach, B., Mattow, J., Halada, P., Lamer, S., Hagens, K., Kaufmann, S. H. E.·1999·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

In 1993, the WHO declared tuberculosis a global emergency on the basis that there are 8 million new cases per year. The complete genome of the strain H37Rv of the causative microorganism, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, comprising 3924 genes has been sequenced. We compared the proteomes of two non‐virulent vaccine strains of M. bovis BCG (Chicago and Copenhagen) with two virulent strains of M. tuberculosis (H37Rv and Erdman) to identify protein candidates of value for the development of vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics. The mycobacterial strains were analysed by two‐dimensional electrophoresis (2‐DE) combining non‐equilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis (NEPHGE) with SDS–PAGE. Distinct and characteristic proteins were identified by mass spectrometry and introduced into a dynamic 2‐DE database (http://www.mpiib‐berlin.mpg.de/2D‐PAGE). Silver‐stained 2‐DE patterns of mycobacterial cell proteins or culture supernatants contained 1800 or 800 spots, respectively, from which 263 were identified. Of these, 54 belong to the culture supernatant. Sixteen and 25 proteins differing in intensity or position between M. tuberculosis H37Rv and Erdman, and H37Rv and M. bovis BCG Chicago, respectively, were identified and categorized into protein classes. It is to be hoped that the availability of the mycobacterial proteome will facilitate the design of novel measures for prevention and therapy of one of the great health threats, tuberculosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01549.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Jungblut, P. R., Schaible, U. E., Mollenkopf, H. ‐., Zimny‐Arndt, U., Raupach, B., Mattow, J., Halada, P., Lamer, S., Hagens, K., & Kaufmann, S. H. E.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1103-1117
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2150127618
Cited by
327
References
2
FWCI
19.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative proteome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG strains: towards functional genomics of microbial pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01549.x
The paper
Jungblut, P. R., Schaible, U. E., Mollenkopf, H. ‐., Zimny‐Arndt, U., Raupach, B., Mattow, J., Halada, P., Lamer, S., Hagens, K., & Kaufmann, S. H. E. (1999). Comparative proteome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG strains: towards functional genomics of microbial pathogens. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01549.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.