The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary conservation of prion‐forming abilities of the yeast Sup35 protein
Open accessAbstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion [PSI ] is a self‐propagating isoform of the eukaryotic release factor eRF3 (Sup35p). Sup35p consists of the evolutionary conserved release factor domain (Sup35C) and two evolutionary variable regions – Sup35N, which serves as a prion‐forming domain in S. cerevisiae, and Sup35M. Here, we demonstrate that the prion form of Sup35p is not observed among industrial and natural strains of yeast. Moreover, the prion ([PSI + ]) state of the endogenous S. cerevisiae Sup35p cannot be transmitted to the next generations via heterologous Sup35p or Sup35NM, originating from the distantly related yeast species Pichia methanolica. This suggests the existence of a ‘species barrier’ in yeast prion conversion. However, the chimeric Sup35p, containing the Sup35NM region of Pichia, can be turned into a prion in S. cerevisiae by overproduction of the identical Pichia Sup35NM. Therefore, the prion‐forming potential of Sup35NM is conserved in evolution. In the heterologous system, overproduction of Pichia Sup35p or Sup35NM induced formation of the prion form of S. cerevisiae Sup35p, albeit less efficiently than overproduction of the endogenous Sup35p. This implies that prion induction by protein overproduction does not require strict correspondence of the ‘inducer’ and ‘inducee’ sequences, and can overcome the ‘species barrier’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Curcumin has potent anti‐amyloidogenic effects for Alzheimer's β‐amyloid fibrils in vitro
Ono, K., Hasegawa, K., Naiki, H., & Yamada, M. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.20025 · Cited by 1,254
Cited by
Conformational variations in an infectious protein determine prion strain differences
Tanaka, M., Chien, P., Naber, N., Cooke, R., & Weissman, J. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02392 · Cited by 770
Prions as adaptive conduits of memory and inheritance
Shorter, J., & Lindquist, S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1616 · Cited by 555
Microbial Cell Individuality and the Underlying Sources of Heterogeneity
Avery, S. V. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1460 · Cited by 521
Prions are a common mechanism for phenotypic inheritance in wild yeasts
Halfmann, R., Jarosz, D. F., Jones, S. K., Chang, A., Lancaster, A. K., & Lindquist, S. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10875 · Cited by 401
Fidelity at the Molecular Level: Lessons from Protein Synthesis
Zaher, H. S., & Green, R. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.036 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Chernoff, Y. O., Galkin, A. P., Lewitin, E., Chernova, T. A., Newnam, G. P., & Belenkiy, S. M.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 865-876
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2127845878
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary conservation of prion‐forming abilities of the yeast Sup35 protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01761.x
- The paper
- Chernoff, Y. O., Galkin, A. P., Lewitin, E., Chernova, T. A., Newnam, G. P., & Belenkiy, S. M. (2000). Evolutionary conservation of prion‐forming abilities of the yeast Sup35 protein. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01761.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.