The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological cost and compensatory evolution in fusidic acid‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
Fusidic acid resistance resulting from mutations in elongation factor G (EF‐G) of Staphylococcus aureus is associated with fitness costs during growth in vivo and in vitro. In both environments, these costs can be partly or fully compensated by the acquisition of secondary intragenic mutations. Among clinical isolates of S. aureus, fusidic acid‐resistant strains have been identified that carry multiple mutations in EF‐G at positions similar to those shown experimentally to cause resistance and fitness compensation. This observation suggests that fitness‐compensatory mutations may be an important aspect of the evolution of antibiotic resistance in the clinical environment, and may contribute to a stabilization of the resistant bacteria present in a bacterial population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance?
Andersson, D. I., & Hughes, D. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2319 · Cited by 2,294
Self-citationCoagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Becker, K., Heilmann, C., & Peters, G. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00109-13 · Cited by 1,628
Challenges of Antibacterial Discovery
Silver, L. L. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00030-10 · Cited by 1,376
Antimicrobial Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st Century: Past, Evolution, and Future
Unemo, M., & Shafer, W. M. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00010-14 · Cited by 1,151
Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects
Foster, T. J. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux007 · Cited by 845
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagaev, I., Björkman, J., Andersson, D. I., & Hughes, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 433-439
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2102975216
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological cost and compensatory evolution in fusidic acid‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02389.x
- The paper
- Nagaev, I., Björkman, J., Andersson, D. I., & Hughes, D. (2001). Biological cost and compensatory evolution in fusidic acid‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02389.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.