The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial conjugation: a two‐step mechanism for DNA transport
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Bacterial conjugation is a promiscuous DNA transport mechanism. Conjugative plasmids transfer themselves between most bacteria, thus being one of the main causal agents of the spread of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria. Moreover, DNA can be transferred conjugatively into eukaryotic host cells. In this review, we aim to address several basic questions regarding the DNA transfer mechanism. Conjugation can be visualized as a DNA rolling‐circle replication (RCR) system linked to a type IV secretion system (T4SS), the latter being macromolecular transporters widely involved in pathogenic mechanisms. The scheme ‘replication + secretion’ suggests how the mechanism would work on the DNA substrate and at the bacterial membrane. But, how do these two parts come into contact? Furthermore, how is the DNA transported? T4SS are known to be involved in protein secretion in different organisms, but DNA is a very different macromolecule. The so‐called coupling proteins could be the answer to both questions by performing a dual role in conjugation: coupling the two main components of the machinery (RCR and T4SS) and actively mediating DNA transport. We postulate that the T4SS is responsible for transport of the pilot protein (the relaxase) to the recipient. The DNA that is covalently linked to it is initially transported in a passive manner, trailing on the relaxase. We speculate that the pilus appendage could work as a needle, thrusting the substrate proteins to cross one or several membrane barriers into the recipient cytoplasm. This is the first step in conjugation. The second step is the active pumping of the DNA to the recipient, using the already available T4SS transport conduit. It is proposed that this second step is catalysed by the coupling proteins. Our ‘shoot and pump’ model solves the protein–DNA transport paradox of T4SS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism
Yang, W. (2011) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583510000181 · Cited by 692
BIOGENESIS, ARCHITECTURE, AND FUNCTION OF BACTERIAL TYPE IV SECRETION SYSTEMS
Christie, P. J., Atmakuri, K., Krishnamoorthy, V., Jakubowski, S., & Cascales, E. (2005) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123630 · Cited by 630
Wang, Y., Lu, J., Mao, L., Li, J., Yuan, Z., Bond, P. L., & Guo, J. (2019) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0275-x · Cited by 441
Conjugative transposons: the tip of the iceberg
Burrus, V., Pavlovic, G., Decaris, B., & Guédon, G. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03191.x · Cited by 434
Definition of a Bacterial Type IV Secretion Pathway for a DNA Substrate
Cascales, E., & Christie, P. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095211 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Llosa, M., Gomis‐Rüth, F. X., Coll, M., & Cruz, F. D. L.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06-28
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2127847106
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial conjugation: a two‐step mechanism for DNA transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03014.x
- The paper
- Llosa, M., Gomis‐Rüth, F. X., Coll, M., & Cruz, F. D. L. (2002). Bacterial conjugation: a two‐step mechanism for DNA transport. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03014.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.