Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bacterial conjugation: a two‐step mechanism for DNA transport

Open access
Llosa, Matxalen, Gomis‐Rüth, F. Xavier, Coll, Miquel, Cruz, Fernando de la·2002·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Bacterial conjugation is a promiscuous DNA transport mechanism. Conjugative plasmids transfer themselves between most bacteria, thus being one of the main causal agents of the spread of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria. Moreover, DNA can be transferred conjugatively into eukaryotic host cells. In this review, we aim to address several basic questions regarding the DNA transfer mechanism. Conjugation can be visualized as a DNA rolling‐circle replication (RCR) system linked to a type IV secretion system (T4SS), the latter being macromolecular transporters widely involved in pathogenic mechanisms. The scheme ‘replication + secretion’ suggests how the mechanism would work on the DNA substrate and at the bacterial membrane. But, how do these two parts come into contact? Furthermore, how is the DNA transported? T4SS are known to be involved in protein secretion in different organisms, but DNA is a very different macromolecule. The so‐called coupling proteins could be the answer to both questions by performing a dual role in conjugation: coupling the two main components of the machinery (RCR and T4SS) and actively mediating DNA transport. We postulate that the T4SS is responsible for transport of the pilot protein (the relaxase) to the recipient. The DNA that is covalently linked to it is initially transported in a passive manner, trailing on the relaxase. We speculate that the pilus appendage could work as a needle, thrusting the substrate proteins to cross one or several membrane barriers into the recipient cytoplasm. This is the first step in conjugation. The second step is the active pumping of the DNA to the recipient, using the already available T4SS transport conduit. It is proposed that this second step is catalysed by the coupling proteins. Our ‘shoot and pump’ model solves the protein–DNA transport paradox of T4SS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03014.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Llosa, M., Gomis‐Rüth, F. X., Coll, M., & Cruz, F. D. L.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-06-28
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2127847106
Cited by
400
References
0
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial conjugation: a two‐step mechanism for DNA transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03014.x
The paper
Llosa, M., Gomis‐Rüth, F. X., Coll, M., & Cruz, F. D. L. (2002). Bacterial conjugation: a two‐step mechanism for DNA transport. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03014.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.