The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demonstration of a sensory rhodopsin in eubacteria
Abstract
Summary: We report the first sensory rhodopsin observed in the eubacterial domain, a green light‐activated photoreceptor in Anabaena (Nostoc) sp. PCC7120, a freshwater cyanobacterium. The gene encoding the membrane opsin protein of 261 residues (26 kDa) and a smaller gene encoding a soluble protein of 125 residues (14 kDa) are under the same promoter in a single operon. The opsin expressed heterologously in Escherichia coli membranes bound all‐trans retinal to form a pink pigment (λmax 543 nm) with a photochemical reaction cycle of 110 ms half‐life (pH 6.8, 18°C). Co‐expression with the 14 kDa protein increased the rate of the photocycle, indicating physical interaction with the membrane‐embedded rhodopsin, which we confirmed in vitro by affinity enrichment chromatography and Biacore interaction. The pigment lacks the proton donor carboxylate residue in helix C conserved in known retinylidene proton pumps and did not exhibit detectable proton ejection activity. We detected retinal binding to the protein in Anabaena membranes by SDS‐PAGE and autofluorography of 3 H‐labelled all‐trans retinal of reduced membranes from the organism. We conclude that Anabaena rhodopsin functions as a photosensory receptor in its natural environment, and suggest that the soluble 14 kDa protein transduces a signal from the receptor. Therefore, unlike the archaeal sensory rhodopsins, which transmit signals by transmembrane helix–helix interactions with membrane‐embedded transducers, the Anabaena sensory rhodopsin may signal through a soluble cytoplasmic protein, analogous to higher animal visual pigments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generic Assignments, Strain Histories and Properties of Pure Cultures of Cyanobacteria
Rippka, R., Stanier, R. Y., Deruelles, J., Herdman, M., & Waterbury, J. B. (1979) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-111-1-1 · Cited by 7,606
Zhai, Y., Heijne, W. H. M., Smith, D. W., & Saier, M. H. (2001) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(00)00389-8 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Microbial and Animal Rhodopsins: Structures, Functions, and Molecular Mechanisms
Ernst, O. P., Lodowski, D. T., Elstner, M., Hegemann, P., Brown, L. S., & Kandori, H. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4003769 · Cited by 1,153
van der Horst, M. A., & Hellingwerf, K. J. (2004) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar020219d · Cited by 379
Microbial Rhodopsins: Diversity, Mechanisms, and Optogenetic Applications
Govorunova, E. G., Sineshchekov, O. A., Li, H., & Spudich, J. L. (2017) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-101910-144233 · Cited by 363
Self-citationMongodin, E. F., Nelson, K. E., Daugherty, S., DeBoy, R. T., Wister, J., Khouri, H., Weidman, J., Walsh, D. A., Papke, R. T., Sanchez Perez, G., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509073102 · Cited by 309
Lamm, G. H. U., Marin, E., Alekseev, A., Schellbach, A. V., Stetsenko, A., Haro-Moreno, J. M., Bourenkov, G., Borshchevskiy, V., Asido, M., Agthe, M., et al. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adv1015 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, K., Trivedi, V. D., & Spudich, J. L.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1513-1522
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W1510749468
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Demonstration of a sensory rhodopsin in eubacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03395.x
- The paper
- Jung, K., Trivedi, V. D., & Spudich, J. L. (2003). Demonstration of a sensory rhodopsin in eubacteria. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03395.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.