The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms
Open accessAbstract
Summary: It is now apparent that microorganisms undergo significant changes during the transition from planktonic to biofilm growth. These changes result in phenotypic adaptations that allow the formation of highly organized and structured sessile communities, which possess enhanced resistance to antimicrobial treatments and host immune defence responses. Escherichia coli has been used as a model organism to study the mechanisms of growth within adhered communities. In this study, we use DNA microarray technology to examine the global gene expression profile of E. coli during sessile growth compared with planktonic growth. Genes encoding proteins involved in adhesion (type 1 fimbriae) and, in particular, autoaggregation (Antigen 43) were highly expressed in the adhered population in a manner that is consistent with current models of sessile community development. Several novel gene clusters were induced upon the transition to biofilm growth, and these included genes expressed under oxygen‐limiting conditions, genes encoding (putative) transport proteins, putative oxidoreductases and genes associated with enhanced heavy metal resistance. Of particular interest was the observation that many of the genes altered in expression have no current defined function. These genes, as well as those induced by stresses relevant to biofilm growth such as oxygen and nutrient limitation, may be important factors that trigger enhanced resistance mechanisms of sessile communities to antibiotics and hydrodynamic shear forces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Cited by
Innate and Induced Resistance Mechanisms of Bacterial Biofilms
Anderson, G. G., & O'Toole, G. A. (2008) · Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_5 · Cited by 438
Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications
Bhadury, P., & Wright, P. (2004) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1307-5 · Cited by 327
Increased Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Mature Biofilms
Ito, A., Taniuchi, A., May, T., Kawata, K., & Okabe, S. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02949-08 · Cited by 316
Rowlett, V. W., Mallampalli, V. K. P. S., Karlstaedt, A., Dowhan, W., Taegtmeyer, H., Margolin, W., & Vitrac, H. (2017) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00849-16 · Cited by 283
Ulett, G. C., Valle, J., Beloin, C., Sherlock, O., Ghigo, J.-M., & Schembri, M. A. (2007) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01952-06 · Cited by 214
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schembri, M. A., Kjærgaard, K., & Klemm, P.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-25
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 253-267
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2135385444
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03432.x
- The paper
- Schembri, M. A., Kjærgaard, K., & Klemm, P. (2003). Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03432.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.