The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Mature Biofilms
Open accessAbstract
Biofilms are considered to be highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this high resistance of biofilms, including restricted penetration of antimicrobial agents into biofilms, slow growth owing to nutrient limitation, expression of genes involved in the general stress response, and emergence of a biofilm-specific phenotype. However, since combinations of these factors are involved in most biofilm studies, it is still difficult to fully understand the mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antibiotics. In this study, the antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli cells in biofilms was investigated with exclusion of the effects of the restricted penetration of antimicrobial agents into biofilms and the slow growth owing to nutrient limitation. Three different antibiotics, ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (25 μg/ml), and ofloxacin (10 μg/ml), were applied directly to cells in the deeper layers of mature biofilms that developed in flow cells after removal of the surface layers of the biofilms. The results of the antibiotic treatment analyses revealed that ofloxacin and kanamycin were effective against biofilm cells, whereas ampicillin did not kill the cells, resulting in regrowth of the biofilm after the ampicillin treatment was discontinued. LIVE/DEAD staining revealed that a small fraction of resistant cells emerged in the deeper layers of the mature biofilms and that these cells were still alive even after 24 h of ampicillin treatment. Furthermore, to determine which genes in the biofilm cells are induced, allowing increased resistance to ampicillin, global gene expression was analyzed at different stages of biofilm formation, the attachment, colony formation, and maturation stages. The results showed that significant changes in gene expression occurred during biofilm formation, which were partly induced by rpoS expression. Based on the experimental data, it is likely that the observed resistance of biofilms can be attributed to formation of ampicillin-resistant subpopulations in the deeper layers of mature biofilms but not in young colony biofilms and that the production and resistance of the subpopulations were aided by biofilm-specific phenotypes, like slow growth and induction of rpoS-mediated stress responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products
Datsenko, K. A., & Wanner, B. L. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.120163297 · Cited by 14,782
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & William Costerton, J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1 · Cited by 4,585
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations
Andrews, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5 · Cited by 4,129
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Culture Medium for Enterobacteria
Neidhardt, F. C., Bloch, P. L., & Smith, D. F. (1974) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.119.3.736-747.1974 · Cited by 2,958
Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program comstat
Heydorn, A., Nielsen, A. T., Hentzer, M., Sternberg, C., Givskov, M., Ersbøll, B. K., & Molin, S. (2000) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 · Cited by 2,179
Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease
Lewis, K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1557 · Cited by 2,052
Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance
Baker-Austin, C., Wright, M. S., Stepanauskas, R., & McArthur, J. V. (2006) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.006 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges
Peterson, B. W., He, Y., Ren, Y., Zerdoum, A., Libera, M. R., Sharma, P. K., van Winkelhoff, A.-J., Neut, D., Stoodley, P., van der Mei, H. C., et al. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuu008 · Cited by 346
Review: The use of direct fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and enhance production in cattle
McAllister, T. A., Beauchemin, K. A., Alazzeh, A. Y., Baah, J., Teather, R. M., & Stanford, K. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas10047 · Cited by 251
Ryall, B., Eydallin, G., & Ferenci, T. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05028-11 · Cited by 160
Laser-induced vapour nanobubbles improve drug diffusion and efficiency in bacterial biofilms
Teirlinck, E., Xiong, R., Brans, T., Forier, K., Fraire, J., Van Acker, H., Matthijs, N., De Rycke, R., De Smedt, S. C., Coenye, T., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06884-w · Cited by 154
A Method for Quantitative Determination of Biofilm Viability
Welch, K., Cai, Y., & Strømme, M. (2012) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb3020418 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Ito, A., Taniuchi, A., May, T., Kawata, K., & Okabe, S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2009-06-15
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4093-4100
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2132577709
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Mature Biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02949-08
- The paper
- Ito, A., Taniuchi, A., May, T., Kawata, K., & Okabe, S. (2009). Increased Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Mature Biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02949-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.