Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathological inclusion bodies in tauopathies contain distinct complements of tau with three or four microtubule‐binding repeat domains as demonstrated by new specific monoclonal antibodies

De Silva, R., Lashley, T., Gibb, G., Hanger, D., Hope, A., Reid, A., Bandopadhyay, R., Utton, M., Strand, C., Jowett, T., Khan, N., Anderton, B., Wood, N., Holton, J., Revesz, T., Lees, A.·2003·Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

Abstract

Pathological inclusions containing fibrillar aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau protein are a characteristic feature in the tauopathies, which include Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP‐17), progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration and Pick's disease. Tau isoform composition and cellular and regional distribution as well as morphology of these inclusions vary in each disorder. Recently, several pathological missense and exon 10 splice‐donor site mutations of the tau gene were iden‐tified in FTDP‐17. Exon 10 codes for the second of four microtubule‐binding repeat domains. The splice‐site mutations result in increased inclusion of exon 10 which causes a relative increase in tau isoforms containing four microtubule‐binding repeat domains over those containing three repeat domains. This could be a central aetiological mechanism in FTDP‐17 and, perhaps, other related tauopathies. We have investigated changes in the ratio and distribution of three‐repeat and four‐repeat tau in the different tauopathies as a basis of the phenotypic range of these disorders and the selective vulnerability of different subsets of neurones. In this study, we have developed two monoclonal antibodies, RD3 and RD4 that effectively distinguish these closely related tau isoforms. These new isoform‐specific antibodies are useful tools for analysing tau isoform expression and distribution as well as pathological changes in the human brain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00463.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
De Silva, R., Lashley, T., Gibb, G., Hanger, D., Hope, A., Reid, A., Bandopadhyay, R., Utton, M., Strand, C., Jowett, T., Khan, N., Anderton, B., Wood, N., Holton, J., Revesz, T., & Lees, A.
Venue
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-27
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
288-302
ISSN
  • 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2990
OpenAlex
W2035318781
Cited by
220
References
5
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathological inclusion bodies in tauopathies contain distinct complements of tau with three or four microtubule‐binding repeat domains as demonstrated by new specific monoclonal antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00463.x
The paper
De Silva, R., Lashley, T., Gibb, G., Hanger, D., Hope, A., Reid, A., Bandopadhyay, R., Utton, M., Strand, C., Jowett, T., Khan, N., Anderton, B., Wood, N., Holton, J., Revesz, T., & Lees, A. (2003). Pathological inclusion bodies in tauopathies contain distinct complements of tau with three or four microtubule‐binding repeat domains as demonstrated by new specific monoclonal antibodies. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00463.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.