The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Silicon reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions and this is accounted for by a reduction in the transpirational bypass flow
Open accessAbstract
Rice is relatively sensitive to salinity and is classified as a silicon accumulator. There have been reports that silicon can reduce sodium uptake in crop grasses in saline conditions, but the mechanism by which silicon might alleviate salinity damage is unclear. We report on the effects of silicon on growth, gas exchange and sodium uptake in rice genotypes differing in salt tolerance. In non‐saline media there were no effects of supplementary silicate upon shoot fresh or dry weight or upon root dry weight, indicating that the standard culture solution was not formally deficient with respect to silicon. Plants grown with supplementary silicate had slightly, but significantly, shorter leaves than plants grown in a standard culture solution. Salinity reduced growth and photosynthetic gas exchange. Silicate supplementation partly overcame the reduction in growth and net photosynthesis caused by salt. This amelioration was correlated with a reduction in sodium uptake. Silicate supplementation increased the stomatal conductance of salt‐treated plants, showing that silicate was not acting to reduce sodium uptake via a reduction in the transpiration rate. Silicate reduced both sodium transport and the transport of the apoplastic tracer trisodium‐8‐hydroxy‐1,3,6‐pyrenetrisulphonic acid (PTS). This implies that the mode of action of silicate was by partial blockage of the transpirational bypass flow, the pathway by which a large proportion of the uptake of sodium in rice occurs. Mechanisms by which silicate might reduce the transpirational bypass flow directly are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crop Salt Tolerance—Current Assessment
Maas, E. V., & Hoffman, G. J. (1977) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0001137 · Cited by 3,565
Cited by
Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses
Ma, J. F. (2004) · Soil Science and Plant Nutrition · doi:10.1080/00380768.2004.10408447 · Cited by 1,380
Elemike, E. E., Uzoh, I. M., Onwudiwe, D. C., & Babalola, O. O. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9030499 · Cited by 499
Tubana, B. S., Babu, T., & Datnoff, L. E. (2016) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/ss.0000000000000179 · Cited by 392
Role of root hydrophobic barriers in salt exclusion of a mangrove plant A vicennia officinalis
KRISHNAMURTHY, P., JYOTHI‐PRAKASH, P. A., QIN, L., HE, J., LIN, Q., LOH, C., & KUMAR, P. P. (2014) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12272 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- YEO, A. R., FLOWERS, S. A., RAO, G., WELFARE, K., SENANAYAKE, N., & FLOWERS, T. J.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 559-565
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2129851059
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Silicon reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions and this is accounted for by a reduction in the transpirational bypass flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00418.x
- The paper
- YEO, A. R., FLOWERS, S. A., RAO, G., WELFARE, K., SENANAYAKE, N., & FLOWERS, T. J. (1999). Silicon reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions and this is accounted for by a reduction in the transpirational bypass flow. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00418.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.