The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration
Open accessAbstract
A model that couples stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, leaf energy balance and transport of water through the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum is presented. Stomatal conductance in the model depends on light, temperature and intercellular CO 2 concentration via photosynthesis and on leaf water potential, which in turn is a function of soil water potential, the rate of water flow through the soil and plant, and on xylem hydraulic resistance. Water transport from soil to roots is simulated through solution of Richards’ equation. The model captures the observed hysteresis in diurnal variations in stomatal conductance, assimilation rate and transpiration for plant canopies. Hysteresis arises because atmospheric demand for water from the leaves typically peaks in mid‐afternoon and because of uneven distribution of soil matric potentials with distance from the roots. Potentials at the root surfaces are lower than in the bulk soil, and once soil water supply starts to limit transpiration, root potentials are substantially less negative in the morning than in the afternoon. This leads to higher stomatal conductances, CO 2 assimilation and transpiration in the morning compared to later in the day. Stomatal conductance is sensitive to soil and plant hydraulic properties and to root length density only after approximately 10 d of soil drying, when supply of water by the soil to the roots becomes limiting. High atmospheric demand causes transpiration rates, LE, to decline at a slightly higher soil water content,θs, than at low atmospheric demand, but all curves of LE versus θs fall on the same line when soil water supply limits transpiration. Stomatal conductance cannot be modelled in isolation, but must be fully coupled with models of photosynthesis/respiration and the transport of water from soil, through roots, stems and leaves to the atmosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Jarvis, P. G. (1976) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0035 · Cited by 3,260
Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., & Berry, J. A. (1987) · Progress in Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48 · Cited by 2,496
Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., & Berry, J. A. (1991) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8 · Cited by 2,270
A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation
Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., Collatz, G. J., Berry, J. A., Field, C. B., Dazlich, D. A., Zhang, C., Collelo, G. D., & Bounoua, L. (1996) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0676:arlspf>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,968
Norman, J. M., Kustas, W. P., & Humes, K. S. (1995) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0168-1923(95)02265-y · Cited by 1,724
A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants
LEUNING, R. (1995) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00370.x · Cited by 1,572
Self-citationTardieu, F. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.419 · Cited by 1,329
Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big‐leaf models
DE PURY, D. G. G., & FARQUHAR, G. D. (1997) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1997.00094.x · Cited by 1,193
Cited by
Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure
Martin‐StPaul, N., Delzon, S., & Cochard, H. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12851 · Cited by 820
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level
DAMOUR, G., SIMONNEAU, T., COCHARD, H., & URBAN, L. (2010) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x · Cited by 710
Management of crop water under drought: a review
Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4 · Cited by 629
Urban, J., Ingwers, M. W., McGuire, M. A., & Teskey, R. O. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx052 · Cited by 486
Drake, J. E., Tjoelker, M. G., Vårhammar, A., Medlyn, B. E., Reich, P. B., Leigh, A., Pfautsch, S., Blackman, C. J., López, R., Aspinwall, M. J., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14037 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- TUZET, A., PERRIER, A., & LEUNING, R.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1097-1116
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2134307851
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01035.x
- The paper
- TUZET, A., PERRIER, A., & LEUNING, R. (2003). A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01035.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.