The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours
Abstract
Stomatal control of species with contrasting stomatal behaviours have been investigated under natural fluctuations of evaporative demand and soil water status. Sunflower and barley (anisohydric behaviour) have a daytime leaf water potential (ΨI) which markedly decreases with evaporative demand during the day and is lower in droughted than in watered plants. In contrast, maize and poplar (isohydric behaviour) maintain a nearly constant ΨI during the day at a value which does not depend on soil water status until plants are close to death. Plants were also subjected to a range of soil water potentials under contrasting air vapour pressure deficits (VPD, from 0.5 to 3 kPa) in the field, in the greenhouse or in a growth chamber. Finally, plants or detached leaves were fed with varying concentrations of artificial ABA. Stomatal conductance of well-watered plants had no response to VPD when plants were grown in natural soils, suggesting that the opposite result observed in many laboratory experiments might be linked to the low unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of usual potting substrates. The response of stomatal conductance of all studied species to the concentration of ABA in pressurized xylem sap ([ABA]xyl) was the same whether ABA had an endogenous origin (droughted plants) or was artificially fed. However stomatal response of maize and poplar to [ABA]xyl markedly changed with varying evaporative demand or ΨI, whereas this was not the case in sunflower or barley. This suggests that isohydric behaviour is linked to an interaction between hydraulic and chemical information, while anisohydric behaviour is linked to an absence of interaction. In all cases, [ABA]xyl was related to soil water status with common relationships for different experimental conditions, but with markedly different responses among species. Diurnal variations of [ABA]xyl with evaporative demand were small in all studied species. Results are synthesized in a model which accounts for observed behaviours of gs, ΨI and [ABA]xyl in fluctuating conditions and for several species. The validity of this model, in particular the physiological meaning of [ABA]xyl, is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited
FLEXAS, J. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf027 · Cited by 1,645
MEDRANO, H. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf079 · Cited by 1,021
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level
DAMOUR, G., SIMONNEAU, T., COCHARD, H., & URBAN, L. (2010) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x · Cited by 710
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2002) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp01119 · Cited by 701
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tardieu, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 90001
- Pages
- 419-432
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2150866414
- Cited by
- 1,329
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.419
- The paper
- Tardieu, F. (1998). Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.