Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,329

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours

Tardieu, F·1998·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

Stomatal control of species with contrasting stomatal behaviours have been investigated under natural fluctuations of evaporative demand and soil water status. Sunflower and barley (anisohydric behaviour) have a daytime leaf water potential (ΨI) which markedly decreases with evaporative demand during the day and is lower in droughted than in watered plants. In contrast, maize and poplar (isohydric behaviour) maintain a nearly constant ΨI during the day at a value which does not depend on soil water status until plants are close to death. Plants were also subjected to a range of soil water potentials under contrasting air vapour pressure deficits (VPD, from 0.5 to 3 kPa) in the field, in the greenhouse or in a growth chamber. Finally, plants or detached leaves were fed with varying concentrations of artificial ABA. Stomatal conductance of well-watered plants had no response to VPD when plants were grown in natural soils, suggesting that the opposite result observed in many laboratory experiments might be linked to the low unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of usual potting substrates. The response of stomatal conductance of all studied species to the concentration of ABA in pressurized xylem sap ([ABA]xyl) was the same whether ABA had an endogenous origin (droughted plants) or was artificially fed. However stomatal response of maize and poplar to [ABA]xyl markedly changed with varying evaporative demand or ΨI, whereas this was not the case in sunflower or barley. This suggests that isohydric behaviour is linked to an interaction between hydraulic and chemical information, while anisohydric behaviour is linked to an absence of interaction. In all cases, [ABA]xyl was related to soil water status with common relationships for different experimental conditions, but with markedly different responses among species. Diurnal variations of [ABA]xyl with evaporative demand were small in all studied species. Results are synthesized in a model which accounts for observed behaviours of gs, ΨI and [ABA]xyl in fluctuating conditions and for several species. The validity of this model, in particular the physiological meaning of [ABA]xyl, is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.419

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,329

Metadata

Authors
Tardieu, F.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
49
Issue
90001
Pages
419-432
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2150866414
Cited by
1,329
References
0
FWCI
12.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.419
The paper
Tardieu, F. (1998). Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.419

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.