Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biological control of Sclerotinia minor using a chitinolytic bacterium and actinomycetes

El‐Tarabily, K. A., Soliman, M. H., Nassar, A. H., Al‐Hassani, H. A., Sivasithamparam, K., McKenna, F., Hardy, G. E. ST. J.·2000·Plant Pathology

Abstract

Isolates of 85 bacteria and 94 streptomycete and 35 nonstreptomycete actinomycetes were obtained from a lettuce‐growing field in Al‐Ain, United Arab Emirates, on colloidal chitin agar, and screened for their ability to produce chitinase. Twenty‐three bacteria and 38 streptomycete and 15 nonstreptomycete actinomycete isolates produced high levels of chitinase and were examined in vitro for their ability to suppress the growth of Sclerotinia minor , a pathogen causing basal drop disease of lettuce. The three most suppressive isolates were examined further for their production of β‐1,3‐glucanase and antifungal activity as well as their ability to colonize the roots and rhizosphere of lettuce in vitro and in planta . The three isolates, Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces viridodiasticus and Micromonospora carbonacea , significantly reduced the growth of S. minor in vitro , and produced high levels of chitinase and β‐1,3‐glucanase. Streptomyces viridodiasticus also produced antifungal metabolite(s) that significantly reduced the growth of the pathogen in vitro . When the pathogen was presented as the sole carbon source, all three isolates caused extensive hyphal plasmolysis and cell wall lysis. Serratia marcescens and St. viridodiasticus were competent to varying degrees in colonizing the roots of lettuce seedlings after 8 days on agar plates and the rhizosphere within 14 days in pots, with their competency being superior to that of M. carbonacea . All three isolates, individually or in combination, were antagonistic to S. minor and significantly reduced incidence of disease under controlled glasshouse conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000.00494.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
El‐Tarabily, K. A., Soliman, M. H., Nassar, A. H., Al‐Hassani, H. A., Sivasithamparam, K., McKenna, F., & Hardy, G. E. S. J.
Venue
Plant Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-10
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
573-583
ISSN
  • 0032-0862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3059
OpenAlex
W2012988025
Cited by
276
References
1
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.