The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in DNA‐methylation are associated with a paramutation phenomenon in transgenic petunia
Open accessAbstract
The transgenic petunia line 17‐R contains one copy of the maize A1 gene which mediates brick‐red pelargonidin pigmentation of the flower. A white derivative, 17‐W, was isolated from homozygous progeny of this line in which no pelargonidin pigmentation was observed. In 17‐W the 35S promoter driving the A1 gene was hypermethylated, in contrast to its hypomethylated state in 17‐R. Progeny plants carrying both the 17‐R and 17‐W allele did not show the expected A1 phenotype. Predominantly white progeny and variable plants were observed which showed a continuous change in pattern and intensity of pelargonidin pigmentation. This reduction of A1 activity argues for a semidominant effect of the 17‐W allele which inhibits the activity of its homologue, 17‐R. This system shows striking similarities to some paramutation phenomena in plants which represent a heritable change in gene function of a paramutable allele directed by a paramutagenic homologue. The analysis of the methylation patterns of the A1 alleles suggests that interactions between differentially methylated alleles are responsible for the paramutation‐like effect which is mediated by somatic pairing. The analogy of this system to other phenomena based on homology‐dependent interlocus trans‐inactivation supports the assumption that those may be based on a related mechanism which includes an interaction between ectopic homologues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Repeat-induced gene silencing in mammals
Garrick, D., Fiering, S., Martin, D. I. K., & Whitelaw, E. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0198-56 · Cited by 887
Babenko, O., Kovalchuk, I., & Metz, G. A. S. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.013 · Cited by 513
How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes?
Matzke, M. A., & Matzke, A. (1995) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.3.679 · Cited by 512
(T RANS)G ENE S ILENCING IN P LANTS: How Many Mechanisms?
Fagard, M., & Vaucheret, H. (2000) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.167 · Cited by 297
RNA as a target and an initiator of post-transcriptional gene silencing in trangenic plants
Baulcombe, D. C. (1996) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00039378 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, P., Heidmann, I., & Niedenhof, I.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2068879188
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in DNA‐methylation are associated with a paramutation phenomenon in transgenic petunia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04010089.x
- The paper
- Meyer, P., Heidmann, I., & Niedenhof, I. (1993). Differences in DNA‐methylation are associated with a paramutation phenomenon in transgenic petunia. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04010089.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.