The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visualization of differential gene expression using a novel method of RNA fingerprinting based on AFLP: Analysis of gene expression during potato tuber development
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Using a highly synchronous in vitro tuberization system, in combination with an amplified restriction fragment polymorphism (AFLP†)‐derived technique for RNA fingerprinting (cDNA‐AFLP‡), transcriptional changes at and around the time point of potato tuberization have been analyzed. The targeted expression analysis of a specific transcript coding for the major potato storage protein, patatin and a second transcript, coding for ADP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase, a key gene in the starch biosynthetic pathway is described. This paper confirms that kinetics of expression revealed by cDNA‐AFLP analysis are comparable to those found in Northern analysis. Furthermore, this paper reports the isolation and analysis of two tuberspecific transcript‐derived fragments (TDFs) coding for the lipoxygenase enzyme, which are differentially induced around the time point of tuber formation. Analysis of the two lox TDFs demonstrates that it is possible to dissect the expression modalities of individual transcripts, not independently detectable by Northern analysis. Finally, it is shown that using cDNA‐AFLP, rapid and simple verification of band identity may be achieved. The results indicate that cDNA‐AFLP is a broadly applicable technology for identifying developmentally regulated genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis
Clemens, S. (2001) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s004250000458 · Cited by 1,417
Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays.
Brenner, S., Johnson, M., Bridgham, J., Golda, G., Lloyd, D. H., Johnson, D., Luo, S., McCurdy, S., Foy, M., Ewan, M., et al. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/76469 · Cited by 1,360
Transferable EST-SSR markers for the study of polymorphism and genetic diversity in bread wheat
Gupta, P. K., Rustgi, S., Sharma, S., Singh, R., Kumar, N., & Balyan, H. S. (2003) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-003-0921-4 · Cited by 448
TUBEROSA, R. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf134 · Cited by 397
Integration of multi-omics data for prediction of phenotypic traits using random forest
Acharjee, A., Kloosterman, B., Visser, R. G. F., & Maliepaard, C. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1043-4 · Cited by 109
Self-citationKu, A. T., Huang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-S., Ma, D., & Yeh, K.-W. (2008) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn067 · Cited by 95
Craciun, A. R. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl062 · Cited by 51
Sojikul, P., Kongsawadworakul, P., Viboonjun, U., Thaiprasit, J., Intawong, B., Narangajavana, J., & Svasti, M. R. J. (2010) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01389.x · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Bachem, C. W. B., Van Der Hoeven, R. S., De Bruijn, S. M., Vreugdenhil, D., Zabeau, M., & Visser, R. G. F.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 745-753
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2160791067
- Cited by
- 853
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
