The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controllingPR‐1 gene expression in Arabidopsis
Abstract
Summary: The Arabidopsis PR‐1 gene is one of a suite of genes induced co‐ordinately during the onset of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a plant defense pathway triggered by pathogen infection or exogenous application of chemicals such as salicylic acid (SA) and 2,6‐dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA). We have characterized cis ‐acting regulatory elements in the PR‐1 promoter involved in INA induction using deletion analysis, linker‐scanning mutagenesis, and in vivo footprinting. Compared to promoter fragments of 815 bp or longer (which show greater than 10‐fold inducibility after INA treatment), induction of a 698 bp long promoter fragment is reduced by half and promoter fragments of 621 bp or shorter have lost all inducibility. Additionally, two 10‐bp linker‐scanning mutations centered at 640 bp and 610 bp upstream from the transcription initiation site are each sufficient to abolish chemical inducibility of a GUS reporter fusion. The –640 linker‐scanning mutation encompasses a region highly homologous to recognition sites for transcription factors of the basic leucine zipper class, while the –610 linker‐scanning mutation contains a sequence similar to a consensus recognition site for the transcription factor NF‐κB. Furthermore, several inducible in vivo footprints located at or nearby these motifs demonstrate significant and highly reproducible changes in DNA accessibility following SAR induction. This in vivo signature of protein–DNA interactions after INA induction is tightly correlated with the functionally important regions of the promoter identified by mutation analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures
Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x · Cited by 67,392
Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA
Murray, M. G., & Thompson, W. F. (1980) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/8.19.4321 · Cited by 12,098
GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants.
Jefferson, R. A., Kavanagh, T. A., & Bevan, M. W. (1987) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02730.x · Cited by 9,844
Function and Activation of NF-kappaB in the Immune System
Baeuerle, P. A., & Henkel, T. (1994) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.001041 · Cited by 4,745
Baeuerle, P. A., & Baltimore, D. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81318-5 · Cited by 3,001
Inducibility of κ immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein NF-κB by a posttranslational mechanism
Sen, R., & Baltimore, D. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90807-x · Cited by 1,993
Ryals, J. A., Neuenschwander, U. H., Willits, M. G., Molina, A., Steiner, H. Y., & Hunt, M. D. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809 · Cited by 1,988
Self-citationRequirement of Salicylic Acid for the Induction of Systemic Acquired Resistance
Gaffney, T., Friedrich, L., Vernooij, B., Negrotto, D., Nye, G., Uknes, S., Ward, E., Kessmann, H., & Ryals, J. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.261.5122.754 · Cited by 1,853
Self-citationIn planta Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants
Bechtold, N., Baquero, M., Bonhomme, S., Ferault, M., Horlow, C., Laroche, L., Migdal, M., Mollier, P., Montoro, P., Roux, D., et al. (1993) · HAL · Cited by 1,774
A Central Role of Salicylic Acid in Plant Disease Resistance
Delaney, T. P., Uknes, S., Vernooij, B., Friedrich, L., Weymann, K., Negrotto, D., Gaffney, T., Gut-Rella, M., Kessmann, H., Ward, E., et al. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.266.5188.1247 · Cited by 1,752
Self-citation
Cited by
Durrant, W. E., & Dong, X. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 · Cited by 3,184
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence
Wildermuth, M. C., Dewdney, J., Wu, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35107108 · Cited by 2,357
Systemic Acquired Resistance: Turning Local Infection into Global Defense
Fu, Z. Q., & Dong, X. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606 · Cited by 1,524
Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses
Singh, K. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00289-3 · Cited by 1,381
Metadata
- Authors
- Lebel, E., Heifetz, P., Thorne, L., Uknes, S., Ryals, J., & Ward, E.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-233
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2033993360
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 15.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controllingPR‐1 gene expression in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00288.x
- The paper
- Lebel, E., Heifetz, P., Thorne, L., Uknes, S., Ryals, J., & Ward, E. (1998). Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controllingPR‐1 gene expression in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00288.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.