Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controllingPR‐1 gene expression in Arabidopsis

Lebel, Edouard, Heifetz, Peter, Thorne, Leigh, Uknes, Scott, Ryals, John, Ward, Eric·1998·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: The Arabidopsis PR‐1 gene is one of a suite of genes induced co‐ordinately during the onset of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a plant defense pathway triggered by pathogen infection or exogenous application of chemicals such as salicylic acid (SA) and 2,6‐dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA). We have characterized cis ‐acting regulatory elements in the PR‐1 promoter involved in INA induction using deletion analysis, linker‐scanning mutagenesis, and in vivo footprinting. Compared to promoter fragments of 815 bp or longer (which show greater than 10‐fold inducibility after INA treatment), induction of a 698 bp long promoter fragment is reduced by half and promoter fragments of 621 bp or shorter have lost all inducibility. Additionally, two 10‐bp linker‐scanning mutations centered at 640 bp and 610 bp upstream from the transcription initiation site are each sufficient to abolish chemical inducibility of a GUS reporter fusion. The –640 linker‐scanning mutation encompasses a region highly homologous to recognition sites for transcription factors of the basic leucine zipper class, while the –610 linker‐scanning mutation contains a sequence similar to a consensus recognition site for the transcription factor NF‐κB. Furthermore, several inducible in vivo footprints located at or nearby these motifs demonstrate significant and highly reproducible changes in DNA accessibility following SAR induction. This in vivo signature of protein–DNA interactions after INA induction is tightly correlated with the functionally important regions of the promoter identified by mutation analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00288.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Lebel, E., Heifetz, P., Thorne, L., Uknes, S., Ryals, J., & Ward, E.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-10
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
223-233
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2033993360
Cited by
356
References
48
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controllingPR‐1 gene expression in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00288.x
The paper
Lebel, E., Heifetz, P., Thorne, L., Uknes, S., Ryals, J., & Ward, E. (1998). Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controllingPR‐1 gene expression in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00288.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.