The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Non‐invasive quantitative detection and applications of non‐toxic, S65T‐type green fluorescent protein in living plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Green fluorescent protein (GFP) has emerged as a powerful new tool in a variety of organisms. An engineered sGFP(S65T) sequence containing optimized codons of highly expressed eukaryotic proteins has provided up to 100‐fold brighter fluorescence signals than the original jellyfish GFP sequence in plant and mammalian cells. It would be useful to establish a non‐invasive, quantitative detection system which is optimized for S65T‐type GFP, one of the brightest chromophore mutants among the various GFPs. We demonstrate here that highly fluorescent transgenic Arabidopsis can be generated, and the fluorescence intensity of whole plants can be measured under non‐disruptive, sterile conditions using a quantitative fluorescent imaging system with blue laser excitation. Homozygous plants can be distinguished from heterozygous plants and fully fertile progenies can be obtained from the analyzed plants. In the case of cultured tobacco cells, GFP‐positive cells can be quantitatively distinguished from non‐transformed cells under non‐selective conditions. This system will be useful in applications such as mutant screening, analysis of whole‐body phenomena, including gene silencing and quantitative assessments of colonies from microorganisms to cultured eukaryotic cells. To facilitate the elucidation of protein targeting and organelle biogenesis in planta, we also generated transgenic Arabidopsis that stably express the plastid‐ or mitochondria‐targeted sGFP(S65T). Etioplasts in dark‐grown cotyledons and mitochondria in dry seed embryos could be visualized for the first time in transgenic Arabidopsis plants under normal growing conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lin, H., Wang, R., Qian, Q., Yan, M., Meng, X., Fu, Z., Yan, C., Jiang, B., Su, Z., Li, J., et al. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.065987 · Cited by 670
The seco-iridoid pathway from Catharanthus roseus
Miettinen, K., Dong, L., Navrot, N., Schneider, T., Burlat, V., Pollier, J., Woittiez, L., van der Krol, S., Lugan, R., Ilc, T., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4606 · Cited by 508
Billinton, N., & Knight, A. W. (2001) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.2000.5006 · Cited by 499
CHLOROPLAST UNUSUAL POSITIONING1 Is Essential for Proper Chloroplast Positioning
Oikawa, K., Kasahara, M., Kiyosue, T., Kagawa, T., Suetsugu, N., Takahashi, F., Kanegae, T., Niwa, Y., Kadota, A., & Wada, M. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.016428 · Cited by 258
Self-citationSirikantaramas, S., Taura, F., Tanaka, Y., Ishikawa, Y., Morimoto, S., & Shoyama, Y. (2005) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pci166 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Niwa, Y., Hirano, T., Yoshimoto, K., Shimizu, M., & Kobayashi, H.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 455-463
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2095648976
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐invasive quantitative detection and applications of non‐toxic, S65T‐type green fluorescent protein in living plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00464.x
- The paper
- Niwa, Y., Hirano, T., Yoshimoto, K., Shimizu, M., & Kobayashi, H. (1999). Non‐invasive quantitative detection and applications of non‐toxic, S65T‐type green fluorescent protein in living plants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00464.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.