Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 640

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis

Open access
Linkohr, Birgit I., Williamson, Lisa C., Fitter, Alastair H., Leyser, H.M. Ottoline·2002·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Plant root systems can respond to nutrient availability and distribution by changing the three‐dimensional deployment of their roots: their root system architecture (RSA). We have compared RSA in homogeneous and heterogeneous nitrate and phosphate supply in Arabidopsis. Changes in nitrate and phosphate availability were found to have contrasting effects on primary root length and lateral root density, but similar effects on lateral root length. Relative to shoot dry weight (DW), primary root length decreased with increasing nitrate availability, while it increased with increasing phosphate supply. Lateral root density remained constant across a range of nitrate supplies, but decreased with increasing phosphate supply. In contrast, lateral root elongation was suppressed both by high nitrate and high phosphate supplies. Local supplies of high nitrate or phosphate in a patch also had different effects. Primary root growth was not affected by a high nitrate patch, but growth through a high phosphate patch reduced primary root growth after the root left the patch. A high nitrate patch induced an increase in lateral root density in the patch, whereas lateral root density was unaffected by a high phosphate patch. However, both phosphate‐ and nitrate‐rich patches induced lateral root elongation in the patch and suppressed it outside the patch. This co‐ordinated response of lateral roots also occurs in soil‐grown plants exposed to a nutrient‐rich patch. The auxin‐resistant mutants axr1, axr4 and aux1 all showed the wild‐type lateral root elongation responses to a nitrate‐rich patch, suggesting that auxin is not required for this response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01251.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 640

Metadata

Authors
Linkohr, B. I., Williamson, L. C., Fitter, A. H., & Leyser, H. M. O.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
751-760
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2113413617
Cited by
640
References
30
FWCI
17.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01251.x
The paper
Linkohr, B. I., Williamson, L. C., Fitter, A. H., & Leyser, H. M. O. (2002). Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01251.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.