Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal mortality and access to obstetric services in West Africa

Open access
Ronsmans, C., Etard, J. F., Walraven, G., Høj, L., Dumont, A., de Bernis, L., Kodio, B.·2003·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary Objectives Process evaluation has become the mainstay of safe motherhood evaluation in developing countries, yet the extent to which indicators measuring access to obstetric services at the population level reflect levels of maternal mortality is uncertain. In this study we examine the association between population indicators of access to obstetric care and levels of maternal mortality in urban and rural West Africa. Methods In this ecological study we used data on maternal mortality and access to obstetric services from two population‐based studies conducted in 16 sites in eight West African countries: the Maternal Mortality and Obstetric Care in West Africa (MAMOCWA) study in rural Sénégal, Guinea‐Bissau and The Gambia and the Morbidité Maternelle en Afrique de l'Ouest (MOMA) study in urban Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Mali, Mauritanie, Niger and Sénégal. Results In rural areas, maternal mortality, excluding early pregnancy deaths, was 601 per 100 000 live births, compared with 241 per 100 000 for urban areas [RR = 2.49 (CI 1.77–3.59)]. In urban areas, the vast majority of births took place in a health facility (83%) or with a skilled provider (69%), while 80% of the rural women gave birth at home without any skilled care. There was a relatively close link between levels of maternal mortality and the percentage of births with a skilled attendant (r = −0.65), in hospital (r = −0.54) or with a Caesarean section (r = −0.59), with marked clustering in urban and rural areas. Within urban or rural areas, none of the process indicators were associated with maternal mortality. Conclusion Despite the limitations of this ecological study, there can be little doubt that the huge rural–urban differences in maternal mortality are due, at least in part, to differential access to high quality maternity care. Whether any of the indicators examined here will by themselves be good enough as a proxy for maternal mortality is doubtful however, as more than half of the variation in mortality remained unexplained by any one of them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01111.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Ronsmans, C., Etard, J. F., Walraven, G., Høj, L., Dumont, A., de Bernis, L., & Kodio, B.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-30
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
940-948
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2077339907
Cited by
168
References
1
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal mortality and access to obstetric services in West Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01111.x
The paper
Ronsmans, C., Etard, J. F., Walraven, G., Høj, L., Dumont, A., de Bernis, L., & Kodio, B. (2003). Maternal mortality and access to obstetric services in West Africa. Tropical Medicine & International Health. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01111.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.