Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 965

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe -- I. Methods and results at z = 0

Open access
Kauffmann, G., Colberg, J. M., Diaferio, A., White, S. D. M.·1999·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We introduce a new technique for following the formation and evolution of galaxies in cosmological N-body simulations. Dissipationless simulations are used to track the formation and merging of dark matter haloes as a function of redshift. Simple prescriptions, taken directly from semi-analytic models of galaxy formation, are adopted for gas cooling, star formation, supernova feedback and the merging of galaxies within the haloes. This scheme enables us to explore the clustering properties of galaxies, and to investigate how selection by luminosity, colour or type influences the results. In this paper we study the properties of the galaxy distribution at z=0. These include B- and K-band luminosity functions, two-point correlation functions, pairwise peculiar velocities, cluster mass-to-light ratios, B-V colours, and star formation rates. We focus on two variants of a cold dark matter (CDM) cosmology: a high-density (Ω =1) model with shape-parameter Γ =0.21 (τ CDM), and a low-density model with Ω =0.3 and λ =0.7 (λ CDM). Both models are normalized to reproduce the I-band Tully--Fisher relation of Giovanelli et al. near a circular velocity of 220 km s−1. Our results depend strongly both on this normalization and on the adopted prescriptions for star formation and feedback. Very different assumptions are required to obtain an acceptable model in the two cases. For τ CDM, efficient feedback is required to suppress the growth of galaxies, particularly in low-mass field haloes. Without it, there are too many galaxies and the correlation function exhibits a strong turnover on scales below 1 Mpc. For λ CDM, feedback must be weaker, otherwise too few L* galaxies are produced and the correlation function is too steep. Although neither model is perfect, both come close to reproducing most of the data. Given the uncertainties in modelling some of the critical physical processes, we conclude that it is not yet possible to draw firm conclusions about the values of cosmological parameters from studies of this kind. Further observational work on global star formation and feedback effects is required to narrow the range of possibilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02202.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 965

Metadata

Authors
Kauffmann, G., Colberg, J. M., Diaferio, A., & White, S. D. M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1999-02-11
Volume
303
Issue
1
Pages
188-206
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2132575702
Cited by
965
References
60
FWCI
59.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe -- I. Methods and results at z = 0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02202.x
The paper
Kauffmann, G., Colberg, J. M., Diaferio, A., & White, S. D. M. (1999). Clustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe -- I. Methods and results at z = 0. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02202.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.