The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mass models of the Milky Way
Abstract
A parameterized model of the mass distribution within the Milky Way is fitted to the available observational constraints. Constraints at R R0 is extremely uncertain. The most important single parameter is the ratio of the scale length R_{d,*} of the stellar disk to R0. The disk and bulge dominate vc(R) at R ~< R0 only for R_{d,*}/R0 ~< 0.25. Since the only knowledge we have of the halo derives from studies like the present one, we allow it to contribute to the density at all radii. When allowed this freedom, however, the halo causes changes in assumptions relating to R R0 to affect profoundly the structure of the best-fitting model at R R0, and vice versa. For example, changing the disk slightly from an exponential surface-density profile significantly changes the form of vc(R) at R >> R0, where the disk makes a negligible contribution to vc. Moreover, minor changes in the constraints can cause the halo to develop a deep hole at its centre that is not physically plausible. These problems call into question the proposition that flat rotation curves arise because galaxies have physically distinct halos rather than outwards-increasing mass-to-light ratios. The mass distribution of the Galaxy and the relative importance of its various components will remain very uncertain until more observational data can be used to constrain mass models. Data that constrain the Galactic force field at z ~> R and at R > R0 are especially important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
galpy: A python LIBRARY FOR GALACTIC DYNAMICS
Bovy, J. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 · Cited by 1,537
Bertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 · Cited by 1,241
The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way
McMillan, P. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 · Cited by 1,099
McMillan, P. J. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18564.x · Cited by 789
THE SAGITTARIUS DWARF GALAXY: A MODEL FOR EVOLUTION IN A TRIAXIAL MILKY WAY HALO
Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/229 · Cited by 550
Metadata
- Authors
- Dehnen, W., & Binney, J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 294
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429-438
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2111733529
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mass models of the Milky Way. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01282.x
- The paper
- Dehnen, W., & Binney, J. (1998). Mass models of the Milky Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01282.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.