Cited by 550Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE SAGITTARIUS DWARF GALAXY: A MODEL FOR EVOLUTION IN A TRIAXIAL MILKY WAY HALO

Open access
Law, David R., Majewski, Steven R.·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a new N -body model for the tidal disruption of the Sagittarius (Sgr) dwarf that is capable of simultaneously satisfying the majority of angular position, distance, and radial velocity constraints imposed by current wide-field surveys of its dynamically young (≲3 Gyr) tidal debris streams. In particular, this model resolves the conflicting angular position and radial velocity constraints on the Sgr leading tidal stream that have been highlighted in recent years. While the model does not reproduce the apparent bifurcation observed in the leading debris stream, recent observational data suggest that this bifurcation may represent a constraint on the internal properties of the Sgr dwarf rather than the details of its orbit. The key element in the success of this model is the introduction of a non-axisymmetric component to the Galactic gravitational potential that can be described in terms of a triaxial dark matter halo whose minor/major axis ratio ( c / a ) Φ = 0.72 and intermediate/major axis ratio ( b / a ) Φ = 0.99 at radii 20 kpc < r < 60 kpc. The minor/intermediate/major axes of this halo lie along the directions ( l , b ) = (7°, 0°), (0°, 90°), and (97°, 0°) respectively, corresponding to a nearly oblate ellipsoid whose minor axis is contained within the Galactic disk plane. This particular disk/halo orientation is difficult to reconcile within the general context of galactic dynamics (and cold dark matter models in particular), suggesting either that the orientation may have evolved significantly with time or that inclusion of other non-axisymmetric components (such as the gravitational influence of the Magellanic Clouds) in the model may obviate the need for triaxiality in the dark matter halo. The apparent proper motion of Sgr in this model is estimated to be (μ l cos b , μ b ) = (−2.16, 1.73) mas yr −1 , corresponding to a Galactocentric space velocity ( U , V , W ) = (230, −35, 195) km s −1 . Based on the velocity dispersion in the stellar tidal streams, we estimate that Sgr has a current bound mass M Sgr = 2.5 +1.3 −1.0 × 10 8 M ☉ . We demonstrate that with simple assumptions about the star formation history of Sgr, tidal stripping models naturally give rise to gradients in the metallicity distribution function (MDF) along the stellar debris streams similar to those observed in recent studies. These models predict a strong evolution in the MDF of the model Sgr dwarf with time, indicating that the chemical abundances of stars in Sgr at the present day may be significantly different than the abundances of those already contributed to the Galactic stellar halo. We conclude by using the new N -body model to re-evaluate previous claims of the association of miscellaneous halo substructure with the Sgr dwarf.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/229

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At larger distances, the flattening of the DM halo becomes important and can affect the dynamics of halo tracers.

    “At larger distances, the flattening of the DM halo becomes important and can affect the dynamics of halo tracers”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Law & Majewski 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 161

  1. Adams, 2007, ApJ, 670, 1027, 10.1086/522581 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10094.x · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08828.x · DOI
  4. Bailin, 2007, ApJ, 667, 191, 10.1086/520843 · DOI
  5. Bailin, 2004, ApJ, 616, 27, 10.1086/424912 · DOI
  6. Bailin, 2005, ApJ, 627, 647, 10.1086/430397 · DOI
  7. Bailin, 2005, ApJ, 627, L17, 10.1086/432157 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083509 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bell, 2008, ApJ, 680, 295, 10.1086/588032 · DOI
  10. 10.1051/0004-6361:20066002 · DOI
  11. Belokurov, 2006, ApJ, 642, L137, 10.1086/504797 · DOI
  12. Belokurov, 2007, ApJ, 658, 337, 10.1086/511302 · DOI
  13. Besla, 2007, ApJ, 668, 949, 10.1086/521385 · DOI
  14. Bett, 2010, MNRAS, 256
  15. 10.1086/170535 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12096.x · DOI
  17. 10.1142/9789812778017_0018 · DOI
  18. Bullock, 2005, ApJ, 635, 931, 10.1086/497422 · DOI
  19. Bullock, 2001, ApJ, 548, 33, 10.1086/318681 · DOI
  20. Buote, 2002, ApJ, 577, 183, 10.1086/342158 · DOI
  21. Casetti-Dinescu, 2009, ApJ, 701, L29, 10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/L29 · DOI
  22. Chabrier, 2001, ApJ, 554, 1274, 10.1086/321401 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12313.x · DOI
  24. Chou, 2010, ApJ, 708, 1290, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1290 · DOI
  25. Chou, 2007, ApJ, 670, 346, 10.1086/522483 · DOI
  26. Cole, 2008, ApJ, 683, 750, 10.1086/589681 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14294.x · DOI
  28. Debattista, 2008, ApJ, 681, 1076, 10.1086/587977 · DOI
  29. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01282.x · DOI
  30. Diehl, 2007, ApJ, 668, 150, 10.1086/521009 · DOI
  31. Diemand, 2007, ApJ, 657, 262, 10.1086/510736 · DOI
  32. Dinescu, 2005, ApJ, 618, L25, 10.1086/427731 · DOI
  33. Dinescu, 2002, ApJ, 575, L67, 10.1086/342915 · DOI
  34. Dohm-Palmer, 2001, ApJ, 555, L37, 10.1086/321734 · DOI
  35. Duffau, 2006, ApJ, 636, L97, 10.1086/500130 · DOI
  36. Edelsohn, 1997, MNRAS, 290, 7, 10.1093/mnras/290.1.7 · DOI
  37. Evans, 2009, ApJ, 695, 1446, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/1446 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15494.x · DOI
  39. Fellhauer, 2006, ApJ, 651, 167, 10.1086/507128 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11658.x · DOI
  41. Font, 2006, ApJ, 638, 585, 10.1086/498970 · DOI
  42. Font, 2001, ApJ, 563, L1, 10.1086/338479 · DOI
  43. 10.1086/117639 · DOI
  44. Geisler, 2005, AJ, 129, 1428, 10.1086/427540 · DOI
  45. Gerhard, 1986, MNRAS, 223, 377, 10.1093/mnras/223.2.377 · DOI
  46. Gnedin, 2005, ApJ, 634, 344, 10.1086/496958 · DOI
  47. Gómez-Flechoso, 1999, A&A, 347, 77
  48. Grillmair, 2006, ApJ, 641, L37, 10.1086/503744 · DOI
  49. 10.1051/0004-6361:20079101 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11599.x · DOI
  51. Helmi, 2004, ApJ, 610, L97, 10.1086/423340 · DOI
  52. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04238.x · DOI
  53. 10.1038/46980 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1086/171025 · DOI
  55. Hoekstra, 2004, ApJ, 606, 67, 10.1086/382726 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/370194a0 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1038/35083506 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06545.x · DOI
  59. Ibata, 2001, ApJ, 551, 294, 10.1086/320060 · DOI
  60. 10.1086/118283 · DOI
  61. Iodice, 2003, ApJ, 585, 730, 10.1086/346107 · DOI
  62. Irwin, 1996, Formation of the Galactic Halo: Inside and Out, 84
  63. Jing, 2002, ApJ, 574, 538, 10.1086/341065 · DOI
  64. Johnston, 1998, ApJ, 495, 297, 10.1086/305273 · DOI
  65. 10.1086/177418 · DOI
  66. Johnston, 1999, AJ, 118, 1719, 10.1086/301037 · DOI
  67. Johnston, 2005, ApJ, 619, 800, 10.1086/426777 · DOI
  68. 10.1086/176247 · DOI
  69. Jurić, 2008, ApJ, 673, 864, 10.1086/523619 · DOI
  70. 10.1051/0004-6361:20041864 · DOI
  71. Kalirai, 2006, ApJ, 641, 268, 10.1086/498700 · DOI
  72. Kazantzidis, 2004, ApJ, 611, L73, 10.1086/423992 · DOI
  73. 10.1071/AS09037 · DOI
  74. Keller, 2008, ApJ, 678, 851, 10.1086/526516 · DOI
  75. Koposov, 2010, ApJ, 712, 260, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/260 · DOI
  76. Kuhlen, 2007, ApJ, 671, 1135, 10.1086/522878 · DOI
  77. Kunder, 2009, AJ, 137, 4478, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4478 · DOI
  78. Kundu, 2002, ApJ, 576, L125, 10.1086/343728 · DOI
  79. Kunkel, 1976, The Galaxy and the Local Group, 182, 241
  80. Larsen, 1996, ApJ, 468, L99, 10.1086/310243 · DOI
  81. Law, 2005, ApJ, 619, 807, 10.1086/426779 · DOI
  82. Law, 2009, ApJ, 703, L67, 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/L67 · DOI
  83. Law, 2004, Satellites and Tidal Streams, 239
  84. Lee, 2003, ApJ, 585, 151, 10.1086/345931 · DOI
  85. Lynden-Bell, 1982, Observatory, 102, 202
  86. 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.003043 · DOI
  87. 10.1086/187462 · DOI
  88. 10.1071/AS04031 · DOI
  89. Majewski, 2006, ApJ, 637, L25, 10.1086/500195 · DOI
  90. Majewski, 1996, ApJ, 459, L73, 10.1086/309944 · DOI
  91. Majewski, 1999, AJ, 118, 1709, 10.1086/301036 · DOI
  92. Majewski, 2003, ApJ, 599, 1082, 10.1086/379504 · DOI
  93. Majewski, 2002, Modes of Star Formation and the Origin of Field Populations, 199
  94. Majewski, 2004, AJ, 128, 245, 10.1086/421372 · DOI
  95. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10539.x · DOI
  96. 10.1051/0004-6361:20078467 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Martínez-Delgado, 2004, ApJ, 601, 242, 10.1086/380298 · DOI
  98. Martínez-Delgado, 2008, ApJ, 689, 184, 10.1086/592555 · DOI
  99. Martínez-Delgado, 2007, ApJ, 660, 1264, 10.1086/513067 · DOI
  100. Martínez-Delgado, 2009, ApJ, 692, 955, 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/955 · DOI
  101. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10403.x · DOI
  102. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06785.x · DOI
  103. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11228.x · DOI
  104. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14489.x · DOI
  105. Miyamoto, 1975, PASJ, 27, 533
  106. 10.1051/0004-6361:20066228 · DOI
  107. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08579.x · DOI
  108. 10.1023/B:MOON.0000031931.12546.7f · DOI
  109. Muñoz, 2006, ApJ, 649, 201, 10.1086/505620 · DOI
  110. 10.1038/353140a0 · DOI
  111. 10.1051/0004-6361:20041055 · DOI
  112. Newberg, 2006, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 47, 195, 10.1088/1742-6596/47/1/024 · DOI
  113. Newberg, 2007, ApJ, 668, 221, 10.1086/521068 · DOI
  114. Newberg, 2009, ApJ, 700, L61, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L61 · DOI
  115. Newberg, 2002, ApJ, 569, 245, 10.1086/338983 · DOI
  116. Newberg, 2003, ApJ, 596, L191, 10.1086/379316 · DOI
  117. Nidever, 2008, ApJ, 679, 432, 10.1086/587042 · DOI
  118. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15287.x · DOI
  119. Odenkirchen, 2009, AJ, 137, 3378, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3378 · DOI
  120. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03053.x · DOI
  121. Pakzad, 2004, BAAS, 36, 1582
  122. Peñarrubia, 2006, ApJ, 645, 240, 10.1086/504316 · DOI
  123. Peñarrubia, 2008, ApJ, 673, 226, 10.1086/523686 · DOI
  124. Peñarrubia, 2009, ApJ, 698, 222, 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/222 · DOI
  125. Perets, 2009, ApJ, 697, 2096, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/2096 · DOI
  126. Plummer, 1911, MNRAS, 71, 460, 10.1093/mnras/71.5.460 · DOI
  127. Prior, 2009, ApJ, 704, 1327, 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1327 · DOI
  128. Pryor, 2010, AJ, 139, 839, 10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/839 · DOI
  129. Putman, 2004, ApJ, 603, L77, 10.1086/382728 · DOI
  130. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09232.x · DOI
  131. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09861.x · DOI
  132. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09959.x · DOI
  133. 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002021 · DOI
  134. Reid, 2004, ApJ, 616, 872, 10.1086/424960 · DOI
  135. Rocha-Pinto, 2004, ApJ, 615, 732, 10.1086/424585 · DOI
  136. 10.1051/0004-6361:20065538 · DOI
  137. Saha, 2009, ApJ, 697, 2015, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/2015 · DOI
  138. 10.1051/0004-6361:20021499 · DOI
  139. 10.1086/156499 · DOI
  140. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12513.x · DOI
  141. Shang, 1998, ApJ, 504, L23, 10.1086/311563 · DOI
  142. Siegel, 2007, ApJ, 667, L57, 10.1086/522003 · DOI
  143. Starkenburg, 2009, ApJ, 698, 567, 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/567 · DOI
  144. Tolstoy, 2004, ApJ, 617, L119, 10.1086/427388 · DOI
  145. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01086.x · DOI
  146. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16192.x · DOI
  147. van den Bosch, 2002, ApJ, 576, 21, 10.1086/341619 · DOI
  148. van der Marel, 2002, AJ, 124, 2639, 10.1086/343775 · DOI
  149. Velazquez, 1995, MNRAS, 275, L23, 10.1093/mnras/275.1.L23 · DOI
  150. Vivas, 2008, AJ, 136, 1645, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/4/1645 · DOI
  151. Vivas, 2005, AJ, 129, 189, 10.1086/426561 · DOI
  152. 10.1086/171937 · DOI
  153. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15242.x · DOI · Paper page
  154. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01790.x · DOI
  155. Widrow, 2008, ApJ, 679, 1232, 10.1086/587130 · DOI
  156. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13198.x · DOI
  157. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10242.x · DOI
  158. Yanny, 2009, ApJ, 700, 1282, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1282 · DOI
  159. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12034.x · DOI
  160. Zentner, 2005, ApJ, 629, 219, 10.1086/431355 · DOI
  161. 10.1119/1.2149869 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-04-08
Volume
714
Issue
1
Pages
229-254
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2033314583
Cited by
550
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 27
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, tidal disruption, triaxial dark matter halos, Galactic potential, non-axisymmetric potential, star formation history, Galactic halo, Magellanic Clouds, N-body simulations, cold dark matter model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review