The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Depolarization and Faraday effects in galaxies
Open accessAbstract
Faraday rotation and depolarization of synchrotron radio emission are considered in a consistent general approach, under conditions typical of spiral galaxies, i.e. when the magneto-ionic medium and relativistic electrons are non-uniformly distributed in a layer containing both regular and fluctuating components of magnetic field, thermal electron density and synchrotron emissivity. We demonstrate that non-uniformity of the magneto-ionic medium along the line of sight strongly affects the observable polarization patterns. The degree of polarization p and the observed Faraday rotation measure RM are very sensitive to whether or not the source is symmetric along the line of sight. The RM may change sign in a certain wavelength range in an asymmetric slab even when the line-of-sight magnetic field has no reversals. Faraday depolarization in a purely regular magnetic field can be much stronger than suggested by the low observed rotation measures. A twisted regular magnetic field may result in p increasing with λ— a behaviour detected in several galaxies. We derive expressions for statistical fluctuations in complex polarization and show that random fluctuations in the degree of polarization caused by Faraday dispersion are expected to become significantly larger than the mean value of p at λ ≳ 20 – 30 cm. We also discuss depolarization arising from a gradient of Faraday rotation measure across the beam, both in the source and in an external Faraday screen. We briefly discuss applications of the above results to radio polarization observations. We discuss how the degree of polarization is affected by the scaling of synchrotron emissivity ε with the total magnetic field strength B. We derive formulae for the complex polarization at λ → 0 under the assumption that ε ∝ B2B2⊥, which may arise under energy equipartition or pressure balance between cosmic rays and magnetic fields. The resulting degree of polarization is systematically larger than for the usually adopted scaling ε ∝ B2⊥; the difference may reach a factor of 1.5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory
Brandenburg, A., & Subramanian, K. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.06.005 · Cited by 1,640
MAGNETIC FIELDS IN CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES
GOVONI, F., & FERETTI, L. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271804005080 · Cited by 486
van Weeren, R. J., Röttgering, H. J. A., Intema, H. T., Rudnick, L., Brüggen, M., Hoeft, M., & Oonk, J. B. R. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219000 · Cited by 139
Polarimetric Properties of Event Horizon Telescope Targets from ALMA
Goddi, C., Martí-Vidal, I., Messias, H., Bower, G. C., Broderick, A. E., Dexter, J., Marrone, D. P., Moscibrodzka, M., Nagai, H., Algaba, J. C., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abee6a · Cited by 111
Sun, X. H., Landecker, T. L., Gaensler, B. M., Carretti, E., Reich, W., Leahy, J. P., McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Crocker, R. M., Wolleben, M., Haverkorn, M., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/40 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Sokoloff, D. D., Bykov, A. A., Shukurov, A., Berkhuijsen, E. M., Beck, R., & Poezd, A. D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 189-206
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1987936139
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depolarization and Faraday effects in galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01782.x
- The paper
- Sokoloff, D. D., Bykov, A. A., Shukurov, A., Berkhuijsen, E. M., Beck, R., & Poezd, A. D. (1998). Depolarization and Faraday effects in galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01782.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.