The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
Open accessAbstract
We develop and test a method for measuring the gravitational lensing-induced distortion of faint background galaxies. We first describe how we locate the galaxies and measure two-component "polarization" or ellipticity statistic eα whose expectation value should be proportional to the gravitational shear γα. We then show that an anisotropic instrumental point-spread function (PSF) perturbs the polarization by δeα = PsαβPβ, where pα is a measure of the PSF anisotropy and Psαβ is the "linearized smear polarizability tensor." By estimating Psαβ for each object we can determine pα from the foreground stars and apply a correction PsαβPβ to the galaxies. We test this procedure using deep high-resolution images from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) which are smeared with an anisotropic PSF and then have noise added to simulate ground-based observations. We find that the procedure works very well. A similar analysis yields a linear shear polarizability tensor Pγαβ which describes the response to a gravitational shear. This calibrates the polarization-shear relation, but only for galaxies which are well resolved. To empirically calibrate the effect of seeing on the smaller galaxies we artificially stretch HST images to simulate lensing and then degrade them as before. These experiments provide a rigorous and exacting test of the method under realistic conditions. They show that it is possible to remove the effect of instrumental PSF anisotropy and that the method provides an efficient and quantitative measurement of the gravitational shear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter
Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Markevitch, M., Randall, S. W., Jones, C., & Zaritsky, D. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/508162 · Cited by 2,470
Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Kauffmann, G., Hirata, C. M., & Brinkmann, J. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10156.x · Cited by 728
Clowe, D., Gonzalez, A., & Markevitch, M. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/381970 · Cited by 638
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, N., Squires, G., & Broadhurst, T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 449
- Pages
- 460
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1988118425
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Method for Weak Lensing Observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/176071
- The paper
- Kaiser, N., Squires, G., & Broadhurst, T. (1995). A Method for Weak Lensing Observations. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/176071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.