Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment

Open access
Bullock, J. S., Kolatt, T. S., Sigad, Y., Somerville, R. S., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A., Primack, J. R., Dekel, A.·2001·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We study dark matter halo density profiles in a high-resolution N-body simulation of a ΛCDM cosmology. Our statistical sample contains ∼5000 haloes in the range 1011−1014 h−1 M⊙, and the resolution allows a study of subhaloes inside host haloes. The profiles are parametrized by an NFW form with two parameters, an inner radius rs and a virial radius Rvir, and we define the halo concentration cvir=Rvirrs. First, we find that, for a given halo mass, the redshift dependence of the median concentration is cvir∝(1+z)−1. This corresponds to rs(z)∼constant, and is contrary to earlier suspicions that cvir does not vary much with redshift. The implications are that high-redshift galaxies are predicted to be more extended and dimmer than expected before. Secondly, we find that the scatter in halo profiles is large, with a 1σ Δ(log cvir)=0.18 at a given mass, corresponding to a scatter in maximum rotation velocities of ΔVmaxVmax=0.12. We discuss implications for modelling the Tully—Fisher relation, which has a smaller reported intrinsic scatter. Thirdly, subhaloes and haloes in dense environments tend to be more concentrated than isolated haloes, and show a larger scatter. These results suggest that cvir is an essential parameter for the theory of galaxy modelling, and we briefly discuss implications for the universality of the Tully—Fisher relation, the formation of low surface brightness galaxies, and the origin of the Hubble sequence. We present an improved analytic treatment of halo formation that fits the measured relations between halo parameters and their redshift dependence, and can thus serve semi-analytic studies of galaxy formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 2,319

Metadata

Authors
Bullock, J. S., Kolatt, T. S., Sigad, Y., Somerville, R. S., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A., Primack, J. R., & Dekel, A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
321
Issue
3
Pages
559-575
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2023344562
Cited by
2,319
References
4
FWCI
68.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x
The paper
Bullock, J. S., Kolatt, T. S., Sigad, Y., Somerville, R. S., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A., Primack, J. R., & Dekel, A. (2001). Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.