The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shapelets -- II. A method for weak lensing measurements
Open accessAbstract
Weak gravitational lensing provides a unique method to directly measure the distribution of mass in the Universe. Because the distortions induced by lensing in the shape of background galaxies are small, the measurement of weak lensing requires high precision. Here, we present a new method for obtaining reliable weak shear measurements. It is based on the shapelet function formalism presented in an earlier paper in which galaxy images are decomposed into several shape components, each providing independent estimates of the local shear. The formalism affords an efficient modelling and deconvolution of the point spread function. Using the unique properties of shapelets under distortions, we construct a simple, minimum variance estimator for the shear. We describe how we implement the method in practice, and test the method using realistic simulated images. We find our method to be stable and reliable for conditions analogous to ground-based surveys. Compared to earlier methods, our method has the advantages of being accurate, linear, mathematically well-defined, and optimally sensitive, as it uses the full shape information available for each galaxy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
Heymans, C., Van Waerbeke, L., Bacon, D., Berge, J., Bernstein, G., Bertin, E., Bridle, S., Brown, M. L., Clowe, D., Dahle, H., et al. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x · Cited by 508
Self-citationThe Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses
Massey, R., Heymans, C., Bergé, J., Bernstein, G., Bridle, S., Clowe, D., Dahle, H., Ellis, R., Erben, T., Hetterscheidt, M., et al. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11315.x · Cited by 403
Self-citationThe dark matter of gravitational lensing
Massey, R., Kitching, T., & Richard, J. (2010) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/8/086901 · Cited by 309
Hildebrandt, H., Erben, T., Kuijken, K., van Waerbeke, L., Heymans, C., Coupon, J., Benjamin, J., Bonnett, C., Fu, L., Hoekstra, H., et al. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20468.x · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Refregier, A., & Bacon, D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-56
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2147677411
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shapelets -- II. A method for weak lensing measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.05902.x
- The paper
- Refregier, A., & Bacon, D. (2003). Shapelets -- II. A method for weak lensing measurements. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.05902.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.