The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses
Open accessAbstract
The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of weak-lensing measurement, in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. We review 16 current and emerging shear-measurement methods in a common language, and assess their performance by running them (blindly) on simulated images that contain a known shear signal. We determine the common features of algorithms that most successfully recover the input parameters. A desirable goal would be the combination of their best elements into one ultimate shear-measurement method. In this analysis, we achieve previously unattained discriminatory precision via a combination of more extensive simulations and pairs of galaxy images that have been rotated with respect to each other. That removes the otherwise overwhelming noise from their intrinsic ellipticities. Finally, the robustness of our simulation approach is confirmed by testing the relative calibration of methods on real data. Weak-lensing measurements have improved since the first STEP paper. Several methods now consistently achieve better than 2 per cent precision, and are still being developed. However, we can now distinguish all methods from perfect performance. Our main concern continues to be the potential for a multiplicative shear calibration bias: not least because this cannot be internally calibrated with real data. We determine which galaxy populations are responsible for bias and, by adjusting the simulated observing conditions, we also investigate the effects of instrumental and atmospheric parameters. The simulated point spread functions are not allowed to vary spatially, to avoid additional confusion from interpolation errors. We have isolated several previously unrecognized aspects of galaxy shape measurement, in which focused development could provide further progress towards the sub-per cent level of precision desired for future surveys. These areas include the suitable treatment of image pixellization and galaxy morphology evolution. Ignoring the former effect affects the measurement of shear in different directions, leading to an overall underestimation of shear and hence the amplitude of the matter power spectrum. Ignoring the second effect could affect the calibration of shear estimators as a function of galaxy redshift, and the evolution of the lensing signal, which will be vital to measure parameters including the dark energy equation of state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SExtractor: Software for source extraction
Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. (1996) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series · doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 · Cited by 10,866
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Bartelmann, M., & Schneider, P. (2001) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00082-x · Cited by 2,420
Type Ia Supernova Explosion Models
Hillebrandt, W., & Niemeyer, J. C. (2000) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.191 · Cited by 1,216
A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
Kaiser, N., Squires, G., & Broadhurst, T. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176071 · Cited by 789
Subaru Prime Focus Camera — Suprime-Cam
Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Sekiguchi, M., Okamura, S., Doi, M., Furusawa, H., Hamabe, M., Imi, K., Kimura, M., Nakata, F., et al. (2002) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/54.6.833 · Cited by 712
Wittman, D. M., Tyson, J. A., Kirkman, D., Dell'Antonio, I., & Bernstein, G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012001 · Cited by 605
Self-citationDetection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
Self-citationSullivan, M., Le Borgne, D., Pritchet, C. J., Hodsman, A., Neill, J. D., Howell, D. A., Carlberg, R. G., Astier, P., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/506137 · Cited by 554
Self-citationShapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
Bernstein, G. M., & Jarvis, M. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/338085 · Cited by 523
Self-citation
Cited by
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Miller, L., Heymans, C., Kitching, T. D., van Waerbeke, L., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Mellier, Y., Rowe, B. T. P., Coupon, J., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts454 · Cited by 447
Self-citationWeak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements
Leauthaud, A., Massey, R., Kneib, J., Rhodes, J., Johnston, D. E., Capak, P., Heymans, C., Ellis, R. S., Koekemoer, A. M., Le Fevre, O., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/516598 · Cited by 434
Self-citationGalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit
Rowe, B. T. P., Jarvis, M., Mandelbaum, R., Bernstein, G. M., Bosch, J., Simet, M., Meyers, J. E., Kacprzak, T., Nakajima, R., Zuntz, J., et al. (2015) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2015.02.002 · Cited by 428
Self-citationWeak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
Mandelbaum, R. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Massey, R., Heymans, C., Bergé, J., Bernstein, G., Bridle, S., Clowe, D., Dahle, H., Ellis, R., Erben, T., Hetterscheidt, M., High, F. W., Hirata, C., Hoekstra, H., Hudelot, P., Jarvis, M., Johnston, D., Kuijken, K., Margoniner, V., Mandelbaum, R., Mellier, Y., Nakajima, R., Paulin-Henriksson, S., Peeples, M., Roat, C., Refregier, A., Rhodes, J., Schrabback, T., Schirmer, M., Seljak, U., Semboloni, E., & Van Waerbeke, L.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 376
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-38
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2116952190
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 22.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11315.x
- The paper
- Massey, R., Heymans, C., Bergé, J., Bernstein, G., Bridle, S., Clowe, D., Dahle, H., Ellis, R., Erben, T., Hetterscheidt, M., High, F. W., Hirata, C., Hoekstra, H., Hudelot, P., Jarvis, M., Johnston, D., Kuijken, K., Margoniner, V., Mandelbaum, R., . . . Van Waerbeke, L. (2007). The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11315.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.