The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature and space density of fossil groups of galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We describe the properties of a sample of galaxy groups with very unusual distributions of galaxy luminosities. The most extreme example has an X-ray luminosity similar to that of the Virgo cluster but has a very low richness, with only one galaxy brighter than L*, compared with six in Virgo. That one galaxy, however, is optically more luminous than any galaxy in Virgo and has an optical luminosity as bright as many of the central cD galaxies in rich Abell clusters. The characteristic feature of the fossil groups we study is that most of the light arises from one dominant, central galaxy. We define a fossil system and, based on this definition, construct a small X-ray-selected, flux-limited sample of fossil groups with well-known selection criteria. We confirm that these systems are indeed groups of galaxies, but dominated by one central luminous giant elliptical galaxy and with few, or no, L* galaxies. We find that fossil systems represent 8–20 per cent of all systems of the same X-ray luminosity. Fossil groups are at least as numerous as all poor and rich clusters combined, and are thus a possible site for the formation of luminous central cluster galaxies before infall into clusters occurs. The fossil systems in our sample have significantly higher X-ray luminosities than normal groups of similar total optical luminosities (or similar X-ray temperature, where the latter can be measured). These enhanced X-ray luminosities may be due to relatively cool gas in the innermost regions or due to a low central gas entropy. We interpret fossil groups as old, undisturbed systems which have avoided infall into clusters, but where galaxy merging of most of the L* galaxies has occurred. An early formation epoch, before that of most groups, could explain low central gas entropies and high X-ray luminosities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation
Lacey, C., & Cole, S. (1993) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.627 · Cited by 2,190
The formation and evolution of galaxies within merging dark matter haloes*
Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., & Guiderdoni, B. (1993) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/264.1.201 · Cited by 1,884
Lynden-Bell, D. (1974) · Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9169(74)90238-4 · Cited by 1,637
Soft X-ray spectrum of a hot plasma
Raymond, J. C., & Smith, B. W. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/190486 · Cited by 1,345
A Catalog of 1.4 GHz Radio Sources from the FIRST Survey
White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., & Gregg, M. D. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303564 · Cited by 1,139
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1995) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/275.3.720 · Cited by 1,102
Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation – II. Comparison with N-body simulations
Lacey, C., & Cole, S. (1994) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/271.3.676 · Cited by 703
Mass Estimates of X-Ray Clusters
EVRARD, A. E., Metzler, C. A., & Navarro, J. F. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177798 · Cited by 631
The LX‐T Relation and Temperature Function for Nearby Clusters Revisited
Markevitch, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306080 · Cited by 576
The structure of clusters of galaxies observed with Einstein
Jones, C., & Forman, W. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/161591 · Cited by 561
Cited by
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Deason, A. J., Mao, Y.-Y., & Wechsler, R. H. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/5 · Cited by 123
Wang, H., Cañameras, R., Caminha, G. B., Suyu, S. H., Yıldırım, A., Chirivì, G., Christensen, L., Grillo, C., & Schuldt, S. (2022) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243600 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, L. R., Ponman, T. J., Horton, A., Babul, A., Ebeling, H., & Burke, D. J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 343
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 627-638
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1989310056
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The nature and space density of fossil groups of galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06702.x
- The paper
- Jones, L. R., Ponman, T. J., Horton, A., Babul, A., Ebeling, H., & Burke, D. J. (2003). The nature and space density of fossil groups of galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06702.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.