The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulations of X-ray clusters
Open accessAbstract
We present simulations of the formation and evolution of galaxy clusters in the cold dark matter cosmogony. Clusters with a wide range of mass were selected from previous N-body models, and were resimulated at higher resolution using a combined N-body/Smooth Particle hydrodynamics code. The effects of radiative cooling on the gas are neglected. While many present-day clusters are predicted to be undergoing mergers, the density profiles of those that are approximately in equilibrium are all very similar, both for the gas and for the dark matter. These profiles show no sign of a uniform-density core and steepen gradually from the centre outwards. The standard β-model is a reasonable fit over most of the radius range observable in real clusters. However, the value obtained for the slope parameter βf increases with the outermost radius of the fit. Temperature profiles of different simulated clusters are also similar. Typically the temperature is almost uniform in the regions that emit most of the X-ray flux but drops at larger radii. The gas temperature and dark matter velocity dispersion in equilibrium clusters give values of βT≡ μmp σ2DM/KT which are consistent with unity provided an X-ray emission-weighted temperature is used. Larger values of βT are found in merging objects where there is a transient boost in the velocity dispersion of the system. Thus βT> 1 may be an observational indicator of merging in real clusters. The similar structure of clusters of differing mass results in scaling relations between the X-ray and dynamical properties of clusters identified at any given redshift. These scalings are inconsistent with the observed slope of the luminosity-temperature relation or the observed sense of evolution of the cluster luminosity function. This suggests that the central properties of intracluster medium are determined by non-gravitational process such as radiative cooling or substantial pre-heating at high redshift.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Self-citationThe Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544
Self-citationCole, S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., & Frenk, C. S. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x · Cited by 1,952
Self-citationRandall, S. W., Markevitch, M., Clowe, D., Gonzalez, A. H., & Bradač, M. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/587859 · Cited by 775
The statistics of CDM halo concentrations
Neto, A. F., Gao, L., Bett, P., Cole, S., Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Springel, V., & Jenkins, A. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12381.x · Cited by 764
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 720-740
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2070998352
- Cited by
- 1,102
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulations of X-ray clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/275.3.720
- The paper
- Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1995). Simulations of X-ray clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/275.3.720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.