The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential gene exchange between parapatric morphs of Littorina saxatilis detected using AFLP markers
Open accessAbstract
Speciation requires the acquisition of reproductive isolation, and the circumstances under which this could evolve are of great interest. Are new species formed after the acquisition of generalized incompatibility arising between physically separated populations, or may they arise as a result of the action of disruptive selection beginning with the divergence of a rather restricted set of gene loci? Here we apply the technique of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis to an intertidal snail whose populations display a cline in shell shape across vertical gradients on rocky shores. We compare the FST values for 306 AFLP loci with the distribution of FST estimated from a simulation model using values of mutation and migration derived from the data. We find that about 5% of these loci show greater differentiation than expected, providing evidence of the effects of selection across the cline, either direct or indirect through linkage. This is consistent with expectations from nonallopatric speciation models that propose an initial divergence of a small part of the genome driven by strong disruptive selection while divergence at other loci is prevented by gene flow. However, the pattern could also be the result of differential introgression after secondary contact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life
Vermeij, G. J. (1987) · doi:10.1515/9780691224244 · Cited by 1,154
Cited by
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae
Turner, T. L., Hahn, M. W., & Nuzhdin, S. V. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030285 · Cited by 734
Stinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
Overview on the Role of Advance Genomics in Conservation Biology of Endangered Species
Khan, S., Nabi, G., Ullah, M. W., Yousaf, M., Manan, S., Siddique, R., & Hou, H. (2016) · International Journal of Genomics · doi:10.1155/2016/3460416 · Cited by 63
Gomes, B., Wilding, C. S., Weetman, D., Sousa, C. A., Novo, M. T., Savage, H. M., Almeida, A. P. G., Pinto, J., & Donnelly, M. J. (2015) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0477-z · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilding, C. S., Butlin, R. K., & Grahame, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 611-619
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W1518887094
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.