Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells

Open access
Baroffio, Anne, Hamann, Martine, Bernheim, Laurent, Bochaton-Piallat, Marie-Luce, Gabbiani, Giulio, Bader, Charles R.·1996·Differentiation

Abstract

We demonstrate that self-renewing myoblasts can be identified in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells (HMSC) in culture. We show, using cytoskeletal proteins and cell size as markers, that self-renewing myoblasts are phenotypically different from other myoblasts, but similar to native HMSC. Native desmin-positive HMSC, cultured as single cells, yielded two major populations of myoblasts, alpha-sarcomeric (alpha-SR)-actin-positive myoblasts and desmin-positive myoblasts. In appropriate culture conditions, alpha-SR-actin-positive myoblasts fused into myotubes, whereas a population of desmin-positive non-fusing myoblasts (NFMB) persisted for weeks among the myotubes. Upon isolation from myotubes, some of the NFMB resumed proliferation and their progeny included fusing and non-fusing myoblasts, with the same cytoskeletal phenotypes as the progeny of native HMSC. This self-renewal cycle could be repeated, yielding four cohorts of myoblasts. The yield of self-renewing cells appeared to decrease with the number of cycles. These results suggest that stem cells are present among NFMB. Moreover, we find that these presumptive stem cells are already segregated during myoblast proliferation. They are small, phenotypically similar to native HMSC, and do not divide unless they are isolated from their sister progeny and cultured alone. Enriched preparations of cells with stem cell-like properties can be obtained from proliferating myoblasts by flow cytometry on the basis of size and nucleocytoplasmic ratio.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1432-0436.1996.6010047.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Baroffio, A., Hamann, M., Bernheim, L., Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L., Gabbiani, G., & Bader, C. R.
Venue
Differentiation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-03
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
47-57
ISSN
0301-4681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971875975
Cited by
170
References
1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1432-0436.1996.6010047.x
The paper
Baroffio, A., Hamann, M., Bernheim, L., Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L., Gabbiani, G., & Bader, C. R. (1996). Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells. Differentiation. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.1996.6010047.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.