The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate that self-renewing myoblasts can be identified in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells (HMSC) in culture. We show, using cytoskeletal proteins and cell size as markers, that self-renewing myoblasts are phenotypically different from other myoblasts, but similar to native HMSC. Native desmin-positive HMSC, cultured as single cells, yielded two major populations of myoblasts, alpha-sarcomeric (alpha-SR)-actin-positive myoblasts and desmin-positive myoblasts. In appropriate culture conditions, alpha-SR-actin-positive myoblasts fused into myotubes, whereas a population of desmin-positive non-fusing myoblasts (NFMB) persisted for weeks among the myotubes. Upon isolation from myotubes, some of the NFMB resumed proliferation and their progeny included fusing and non-fusing myoblasts, with the same cytoskeletal phenotypes as the progeny of native HMSC. This self-renewal cycle could be repeated, yielding four cohorts of myoblasts. The yield of self-renewing cells appeared to decrease with the number of cycles. These results suggest that stem cells are present among NFMB. Moreover, we find that these presumptive stem cells are already segregated during myoblast proliferation. They are small, phenotypically similar to native HMSC, and do not divide unless they are isolated from their sister progeny and cultured alone. Enriched preparations of cells with stem cell-like properties can be obtained from proliferating myoblasts by flow cytometry on the basis of size and nucleocytoplasmic ratio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for a mitotic clock in human hematopoietic stem cells: loss of telomeric DNA with age.
Vaziri, H., Dragowska, W., Allsopp, R. C., Thomas, T. E., Harley, C. B., & Lansdorp, P. M. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.21.9857 · Cited by 1,132
Cited by
Cellular and Molecular Regulation of Muscle Regeneration
CHARGÉ, S. B. P., & RUDNICKI, M. A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2003 · Cited by 2,680
Expression of Cd34 and Myf5 Defines the Majority of Quiescent Adult Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells
Beauchamp, J. R., Heslop, L., Yu, D. S. W., Tajbakhsh, S., Kelly, R. G., Wernig, A., Buckingham, M. E., Partridge, T. A., & Zammit, P. S. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.6.1221 · Cited by 916
Zammit, P. S. (2017) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.011 · Cited by 887
Olguin, H. C., & Olwin, B. B. (2004) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.015 · Cited by 572
Yoshida, N., Yoshida, S., Koishi, K., Masuda, K., & Nabeshima, Y.-I. (1998) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.111.6.769 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Baroffio, A., Hamann, M., Bernheim, L., Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L., Gabbiani, G., & Bader, C. R.
- Venue
- Differentiation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-57
- ISSN
- 0301-4681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971875975
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1432-0436.1996.6010047.x
- The paper
- Baroffio, A., Hamann, M., Bernheim, L., Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L., Gabbiani, G., & Bader, C. R. (1996). Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells. Differentiation. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.1996.6010047.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.