Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OPIOID RECEPTOR SIGNALLING MECHANISMS

Connor, Mark, Christie, MacDonald J·1999·Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract

1. Three pharmacological types of opioid receptors, μ, δ and κ, and their corresponding genes have been identified. Although other types of opioid receptors have been suggested, their existence has not been established unequivocally. A fourth opioid receptor, ORL1, which is genetically closely related to the others, has also been isolated. ORL1 responds to the endogenous agonist nociceptin (orphanin FQ) and displays a pharmacological profile that differs greatly from μ, δ and κ receptors. 2. All opioid receptors mediate many of their cellular effects via activation of heterotrimeric G‐proteins. The μ, δ and κ receptors are all capable of interacting with the pertussis toxin‐sensitive G‐protein α‐subunits G i1, G i2, G i3, G o1, G o2 and the pertussis toxin‐insensitive G z and G 16. None of the opioid receptors interacts substantially with G s and μ receptors do not activate G q, G 11, G 12, G 13 or G 14. 3. Differential coupling of different opioid receptors to most types of G‐proteins is marginal. The μ, δ and κ receptors appear to preferentially activate G o and G i2 over other pertussis toxin‐sensitive G‐proteins, although there is evidence that μ receptors show some preference for G i3. δ Receptors couple more efficiently to G 16 than do μ or κ receptors. 4. There is some evidence that opioid receptors, particularly μ and ORL1 receptors, can also couple to cellular effectors in a G‐protein‐independent manner. 5. In general, the consequences of activation of any of the opioid receptors in a given cell type depend more on the profile (stoichiometry) of the G‐proteins and effectors expressed than on the type of opioid receptor present in the cell. Notions that different types of opioid receptors intrinsically couple preferentially to one type of effector rather than another should, therefore, be discarded.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03049.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Connor, M., & Christie, M. J.
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
493-499
ISSN
  • 0305-1870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1681
OpenAlex
W2017663673
Cited by
258
References
5
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OPIOID RECEPTOR SIGNALLING MECHANISMS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03049.x
The paper
Connor, M., & Christie, M. J. (1999). OPIOID RECEPTOR SIGNALLING MECHANISMS. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03049.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.