The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significance of wild vegetables in micronutrient intakes of women in Vietnam: an analysis of food variety
Abstract
The association between food variety and nutrient intake/health status among rural women was tested in two agro‐ecological settings in Vietnam. Special emphasis was placed on the significance of wild vegetables ‘Rau Dai’ in micronutrient supply and on the usefulness of food variety analysis in determining their current role. Data from 7‐day food frequency interviews and a nutrition/health survey with 93 and 103 rural women in the Mekong Delta and the Central Highlands, respectively, were used in the analysis. Energy and nutrient intakes in the groups with the highest food variety score (FVS) (high = ≥ 21) in the two regions were compared to those with the lowest food variety score (low = ≤15). The high FVS groups in both regions also had a more diversified diet in terms of food categories. With the exception of low iron and riboflavin intakes in all groups, the high FVS groups had relatively adequate diets. A large variety of vegetables was used and only approximately half of the vegetable species were cultivated. In both regions the high FVS groups used a significantly greater variety of vegetables than the low FVS groups. Wild vegetables contributed significantly to the overall micronutrient intakes, mostly carotene, vitamin C and calcium intakes, but only the contribution to carotene intake was significantly higher in the high FVS group. Overall, we conclude that a food variety analysis is a useful tool in capturing the dietary role of wild vegetables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hatløy, A., Hallund, J., Diarra, M. M., & Oshaug, A. (2000) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980000000628 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Food variety and dietary diversity scores in children: Are they good indicators of dietary adequacy?
Steyn, N., Nel, J., Nantel, G., Kennedy, G., & Labadarios, D. (2006) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2005912 · Cited by 712
Arimond, M., Wiesmann, D., Becquey, E., Carriquiry, A., Daniels, M. C., Deitchler, M., Fanou-Fogny, N., Joseph, M. L., Kennedy, G., Martin-Prevel, Y., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.110.123414 · Cited by 614
Improving diets with wild and cultivated biodiversity from across the landscape
Powell, B., Thilsted, S. H., Ickowitz, A., Termote, C., Sunderland, T., & Herforth, A. (2015) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-015-0466-5 · Cited by 382
Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants
Torheim, L. E., Ouattara, F., Diarra, M. M., Thiam, F. D., Barikmo, I., Hatløy, A., & Oshaug, A. (2004) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601853 · Cited by 359
Dietary Diversity within Food Groups: An Indicator of Specific Nutrient Adequacy in Tehranian Women
Mirmiran, P., Azadbakht, L., & Azizi, F. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2006.10719546 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogle, B. M., Hung, P. H., & Tuyet, H. T.
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02-14
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-30
- ISSN
- 0964-7058 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-6047
- OpenAlex
- W2133914507
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of wild vegetables in micronutrient intakes of women in Vietnam: an analysis of food variety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1440-6047.2001.00206.x
- The paper
- Ogle, B. M., Hung, P. H., & Tuyet, H. T. (2001). Significance of wild vegetables in micronutrient intakes of women in Vietnam: an analysis of food variety. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-6047.2001.00206.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.