Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fire regime, fire intensity and tree survival in a tropical savanna in northern Australia

WILLIAMS, R. J., COOK, G. D., GILL, A. M., MOORE, P. H. R.·1999·Australian Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Dry season fires are a feature of the tropical savannas of northern Australia. As part of a landscape‐scale fire experiment, we examined the effects of fire regimes on tree survival in a tropical savanna in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. The fire regimes were annual early dry season (June) fires, annual late dry season (September) fires, and, no fire (control). Prescriptive, experimental fires were lit annually, between 1990 and 1994, in replicate compartments, each 15–20 km 2. In addition to the prescribed fires, however, one of the control compartments, which had been unburnt for seven years, was burnt by an unplanned, high intensity fire (~ 20 000 kW m−1) in September 1994. This provided an opportunity to compare the impacts on the tree stratum of frequent, prescribed burning at various intensities, and a single unplanned fire. In all fire regimes, stem survival was substantially lower than whole‐plant survival, and decreased linearly with increasing fire intensity. Significantly, stem death following the single, high intensity 20 000 kWm−1 fire (75%) was comparable to that of a regime of annual late dry season burning for five years, at an average intensity of c. 8000 kWm−1. In the high intensity unplanned fire, stem survival showed a non‐linear response to stem size, being least in the small (< 10 cm DBH) and large (> 40 cm DBH) size classes, and highest in the intermediate size classes. Stem survival was also species‐dependent, being higher in the dominant Eucalyptus miniata than in the subdominant, broad‐leaf deciduous trees. In the absence of fire for 5–10 years, the structure and composition of the tree stratum of these savannas tends to become more complex than in sites burnt more frequently, especially by high intensity fire. Such a long‐term absence of fire may be a conservation objective for some areas of savanna. However, build‐up of fuel to near maximal levels can occur in 2–4 years without fire. This may predispose the savannas to high‐intensity, late dry season fires. Whatever the fire‐management goal within a given patch of savanna, whether it be the prescribed use of fire on a biennial basis, or the exclusion of fire at a semidecadal scale, careful attention still needs to be given to the consequences of fuel build‐up in fire‐excluded sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1442-9993.1999.00946.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
WILLIAMS, R. J., COOK, G. D., GILL, A. M., & MOORE, P. H. R.
Venue
Australian Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
50-59
ISSN
0307-692X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073522538
Cited by
356
References
20
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fire regime, fire intensity and tree survival in a tropical savanna in northern Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1442-9993.1999.00946.x
The paper
WILLIAMS, R. J., COOK, G. D., GILL, A. M., & MOORE, P. H. R. (1999). Fire regime, fire intensity and tree survival in a tropical savanna in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.1999.00946.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.