The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single‐cell study
Abstract
In order to investigate the neural coding of ordinate‐level visual categories, single‐cell recordings were made in the anterior temporal cortex of two rhesus monkeys performing a categorization of colour images of trees versus images of other objects. Neurons showed a high average degree of selectivity for these complex colour images. Although most neurons responded to trees and non‐trees, about a quarter responded in a category‐specific manner, e.g. to trees but not non‐trees, and about one‐tenth responded almost exclusively to exemplars of the trained category. The responses of these neurons were largely invariant for stimulus transformations, e.g. changes in position or size, and decreased with the degree of image scrambling, mimicking the behavioural results. However, the responses of single neurons were insufficiently stimulus invariant to accommodate the entire range of variability present in the features of exemplars within the same category. This strong within‐category selectivity challenges the idea that a prototype is represented at the single neuron level, but suggests that ordinate‐level categorization is based on a population of neurons, each selective for a limited set of exemplars.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Cited by
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
How does the brain solve visual object recognition?
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,790
Categorical Representation of Visual Stimuli in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex
Freedman, D. J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., & Miller, E. K. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5502.312 · Cited by 1,123
Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Hung, C. P., Kreiman, G., Poggio, T., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117593 · Cited by 854
Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex
Sigala, N., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415318a · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogels, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1239-1255
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2076166015
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single‐cell study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00531.x
- The paper
- Vogels, R. (1999). Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single‐cell study. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00531.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.