Cited by 1,123Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Categorical Representation of Visual Stimuli in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex

Freedman, David J., Riesenhuber, Maximilian, Poggio, Tomaso, Miller, Earl K.·2001·Science

Abstract

The ability to group stimuli into meaningful categories is a fundamental cognitive process. To explore its neural basis, we trained monkeys to categorize computer-generated stimuli as “cats” and “dogs.” A morphing system was used to systematically vary stimulus shape and precisely define the category boundary. Neural activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex reflected the category of visual stimuli, even when a monkey was retrained with the stimuli assigned to new categories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.291.5502.312

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Areas of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex are implicated in semantic processing, object categorization, representation of feature-based information for abstract categories, selection among competing response representations, and response inhibition.

    “Areas of the VLPFC on the other hand, are implicated in semantic processing tasks (e.g., Gitelman et al. 2005), categorization of objects (e.g., Freedman et al. 2001), representation of feature-based information for abstract categories (e.g., Freedman et al. 2002; see Miller et al. 2002), selection amongst competing response representations (e.g., Badre & Wagner 2007; Schnur et al. 2009), and”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Freedman et al. 2001

  • This class of models is qualitatively and quantitatively consistent with several properties of subpopulations of cells in V1, V4, IT, and PFC as well as fMRI and psychophysical data.

    “This class of models seems to be qualitatively and quantitatively consistent with [and in some cases actually predicts (23)] several properties of subpopulations of cells in V1, V4, IT, and PFC (25) as well as fMRI and psychophysical data.”

    From A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization (2007) · cites this paper as [25]

  • After the initial unsupervised learning stage, only the task-specific circuits at the top level in the model, possibly corresponding to categorization units in PFC, have to be trained from a small set of labeled examples and in a task-specific manner for the 'mature' model to learn a categorization task.

    “After this initial unsupervised learning stage, only the task-specific circuits at the top level in the model, possibly corresponding to categorization units in PFC (25), have to be trained from a small set of labeled examples and in a task-specific manner (see Materials and Methods ) for the ''mature'' model to learn a categorization task (e.g., animal vs. non-animal).”

    From A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization (2007) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freedman, D. J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., & Miller, E. K.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Earl K.
Venue
Science
Published
2001-01-12
Volume
291
Issue
5502
Pages
312-316
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2060971741
Cited by
1,123
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 49
FWCI
19.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
categorical representation, visual categorization, lateral prefrontal cortex, category boundaries, category learning, primate visual cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Brain Mapping, Cats, Cognition, Dogs, Form Perception, Learning, Mental Processes, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Temporal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review