CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 331Multisensory perception and integrationVestibular and auditory disordersVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual-vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP)

Bremmer, Frank, Klam, François, Duhamel, Jean‐René, Ben Hamed, Suliann, Graf, Werner·2002·European Journal of Neuroscience
DOI 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02206.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Self-motion detection requires the interaction of a number of sensory systems for correct perceptual interpretation of a given movement and an eventual motor response. Parietal cortical areas are thought to play an important role in this function, and we have thus studied the encoding of multimodal signals and their spatiotemporal interactions in the ventral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys. Thereby, we have identified for the first time the presence of vestibular sensory input to this area and described its interaction with somatosensory and visual signals, via extracellular single-cell recordings in awake head-fixed animals. Visual responses were driven by large field stimuli that simulated either backward or forward self-motion (contraction or expansion stimuli, respectively), or movement in the frontoparallel plane (visual increments moving simultaneously in the same direction). While the dominant sensory modality in most neurons was visual, about one third of all recorded neurons responded to horizontal rotation. These vestibular responses were typically in phase with head velocity, but in some cases they could signal acceleration or even showed integration to position. The associated visual responses were always codirectional with the vestibular on-direction, i.e. noncomplementary. Somatosensory responses were in register with the visual preferred direction, either in the same or in the opposite direction, thus signalling translation or rotation in the horizontal plane. These results, taken together with data on responses to optic flow stimuli obtained in a parallel study, strongly suggest an involvement of area VIP in the analysis and the encoding of self-motion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02206.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Belton T., 2000, The non‐visual complex spike modulation in the flocculus: a signal in search of an error, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 26, 1987
  2. Bremmer F., 1995, Supramodal encoding of movement space in the ventral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 21, 282
  3. Bremmer F., 1999, Representation of near extra‐personal space in the macaque ventral intraparietal area, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 25, 1164
  4. Graf W., 1996, Visual–vestibular interaction in the ventral intraparietal area (VIP) of macaque monkeys, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 22, 1692
  5. Graf W., 1995, Oculomotor, vestibular, and visual response properties of neurons in the anterior inferior parietal lobule of macaque monkeys, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 21, 665
  6. Paré M., 1999, Visual motion signals from the ventral intraparietal area to the saccadic system, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 25, 806
  7. Schlack A., 2001, Crossmodal interaction of linear vestibular and visual stimulation in macaque area VIP, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 27, 688
  8. Schlack A., 2000, Spatially congruent auditory and visual responses in macaque area VIP, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 26, 1064
  9. Stanton G.B., 1998, Cortical afferents to the smooth‐pursuit eye movement region of the macaque frontal eye field (FEFsem), Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 24, 1146

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 331

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bremmer, F., Klam, F., Duhamel, J., Ben Hamed, S., & Graf, W.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Bremmer, Frank
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1569-1586
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
DOI
10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02206.x
OpenAlex
W1974454781
Cited by
331
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 29 d)
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
ventral intraparietal area, vestibular responses, visual-vestibular interaction, somatosensory responses, multisensory integration, macaque, head rotation, optical flow, parietal cortex
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Postural Balance, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Eye Movements, Female, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Motion Perception, Neurons, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Touch, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review