Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐term survival and cell death of newly generated neurons in the adult rat olfactory bulb

Winner, Beate, Cooper‐Kuhn, Christiana M., Aigner, Robert, Winkler, Jürgen, Kuhn, H. Georg·2002·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In the adult rat olfactory bulb, neurons are continually generated from progenitors that reside in the lateral ventricle wall. This study investigates long‐term survival and cell death of newly generated cells within the adult olfactory bulb. After injecting rats at 2 months of age with 5‐bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), the newly generated cells were quantified over a period of 19 months. A peak of BrdU‐positive cells was reached in the olfactory bulb 1 month after BrdU injection, when all new cells have finished migrating from the ventricle wall. Thereafter, a reduction of BrdU‐positive cells to about 50% was observed and it was confirmed by dUTP‐nick end‐labelling (TUNEL) that progenitors and young neurons undergo programmed cell death. However, cells that survived the first 3 months after BrdU injection persisted for up to 19 months. The majority of the BrdU‐positive cells that reach the olfactory bulb differentiate into granule cells, but a small fraction migrate further into the glomerular layer. These newborn cells differentiate more slowly into periglomerular interneurons, with a delay of more than 1 month when compared to the granule cells. The newly generated periglomerular neurons, among them a significant fraction of dopaminergic cells, showed a similar decline in number compared to the granule cell layer and long‐term survival for the remaining new neurons of up to 19 months. Rather than replacing old neurons, this data suggests that adult olfactory bulb neurogenesis utilizes the overproduction and turnover of young neurons, which is reminiscent of the cellular dynamics observed during brain development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02238.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Winner, B., Cooper‐Kuhn, C. M., Aigner, R., Winkler, J., & Kuhn, H. G.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1681-1689
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1983456059
Cited by
412
References
3
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term survival and cell death of newly generated neurons in the adult rat olfactory bulb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02238.x
The paper
Winner, B., Cooper‐Kuhn, C. M., Aigner, R., Winkler, J., & Kuhn, H. G. (2002). Long‐term survival and cell death of newly generated neurons in the adult rat olfactory bulb. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02238.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.