The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing
Abstract
Behavioural data have shown that the perception of an object automatically potentiates motor components (affordances) of possible actions toward that object, irrespective of the subject's intention. We carried out an event‐related fMRI study to investigate the influence of the intrinsic properties of an object on motor responses which were either compatible or incompatible with the action that the object affords. The subjects performed power or precision grip responses based on the categorization of objects into natural or man‐made. The objects were either ‘small’ (usually grasped with a precision grip) or ‘large’ (usually grasped with a power grip). As expected, the motor responses were fastest to objects that afforded the same grip (congruent) and slowest to objects that afforded the other grip (incongruent). Imaging revealed activations which covaried with compatibility in the parietal, dorsal premotor and inferior frontal cortex. We suggest that the greater the difference in reaction times between congruent and incongruent trials, the greater the competition between the action afforded by the object and the action specified by the task, and thus the greater the activation within this network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Kimmig, H., Greenlee, M., Gondan, M., Schira, M., Kassubek, J., & Mergner, T. (2001) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210100844 · Cited by 158
Cited by
The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework
Pacherie, E. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003 · Cited by 618
Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action
Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001392 · Cited by 614
Jasinska, A. J., Stein, E. A., Kaiser, J., Naumer, M. J., & Yalachkov, Y. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.013 · Cited by 513
Action priming by briefly presented objects
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.01.004 · Cited by 478
Self-citationCortical Networks Related to Human Use of Tools
Lewis, J. W. (2006) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858406288327 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis, R., & Passingham, R. E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2735-2740
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W1972198437
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x
- The paper
- Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis, R., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.