The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on digital fundus images
Abstract
Aims The aim was to develop an automated screening system to analyse digital colour retinal images for important features of non‐proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Methods High performance pre‐processing of the colour images was performed. Previously described automated image analysis systems were used to detect major landmarks of the retinal image (optic disc, blood vessels and fovea). Recursive region growing segmentation algorithms combined with the use of a new technique, termed a ‘Moat Operator’, were used to automatically detect features of NPDR. These features included haemorrhages and microaneurysms (HMA), which were treated as one group, and hard exudates as another group. Sensitivity and specificity data were calculated by comparison with an experienced fundoscopist. Results The algorithm for exudate recognition was applied to 30 retinal images of which 21 contained exudates and nine were without pathology. The sensitivity and specificity for exudate detection were 88.5% and 99.7%, respectively, when compared with the ophthalmologist. HMA were present in 14 retinal images. The algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 77.5% and specificity of 88.7% for detection of HMA. Conclusions Fully automated computer algorithms were able to detect hard exudates and HMA. This paper presents encouraging results in automatic identification of important features of NPDR. Diabet. Med. 19, 105–112 (2002)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina
Staal, J., Abramoff, M. D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M. A., & van Ginneken, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.825627 · Cited by 4,202
Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology
Ting, D. S. W., Pasquale, L. R., Peng, L., Campbell, J. P., Lee, A. Y., Raman, R., Tan, G. S. W., Schmetterer, L., Keane, P. A., & Wong, T. Y. (2019) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313173 · Cited by 1,554
the DIARETDB1 diabetic retinopathy database and evaluation protocol
Kauppi, T., Kalesnykiene, V., Kamarainen, J.-K., Lensu, L., Sorri, I., Raninen, A., Voutilainen, R., Uusitalo, H., Kalviainen, H., & Pietila, J. (2007) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2007 · doi:10.5244/c.21.15 · Cited by 854
Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema
Ciulla, T. A., Amador, A. G., & Zinman, B. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653 · Cited by 836
van Grinsven, M. J. J. P., van Ginneken, B., Hoyng, C. B., Theelen, T., & Sanchez, C. I. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2526689 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinthanayothin, C., Boyce, J. F., Williamson, T. H., Cook, H. L., Mensah, E., Lal, S., & Usher, D.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-112
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2142866653
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on digital fundus images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00613.x
- The paper
- Sinthanayothin, C., Boyce, J. F., Williamson, T. H., Cook, H. L., Mensah, E., Lal, S., & Usher, D. (2002). Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on digital fundus images. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00613.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.