Cited by 86Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and biodiversity studies

Effects of drought on contrasting insect and plant species in the UK in the mid-1990s

Open access
Morecroft, M. D., Bealey, C. E., Howells, O., Rennie, S., Woiwod, I. P.·2002·Global Ecology and Biogeography

Abstract

AbstractAim We examined the effects of drought in the summer of 1995 and the subsequent year on contrasting species of plants, moths, butterflies and ground beetles. We tested whether population increases were associated with: (a) species of warm environments (b) species of dry environments (c) species with rapid reproduction (d) species with high rates of dispersal. Location The study was conducted at Environmental Change Network (ECN) sites throughout Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Methods Climate monitoring, recording of plant species in permanent plots, transect walking for butterflies, light trapping for moths and pitfall trapping for carabid beetles were used. Results There was an overall increase in the number of species recorded in permanent vegetation plots between 1994 and 1996, principally among the annual and biennial vascular plants, probably as a result of gap colonization in grasslands. Most butterfly and moth species increased between 1994 and 1995. Among the butterflies, a southern distribution and high mobility were associated with species tending to increase throughout the period 1994–96, whereas declining species tended to have a northern distribution. A similar number of carabid beetle species increased as decreased in the period 1994–96; decreasing species tended to be associated with lower temperatures and wetter soils. Conclusions: Current climate change scenarios indicate that the incidence of droughts in the United Kingdom will increase. A series of dry, hot summers could lead to a rapid change in the population of some species although others, including many plants, may be more resilient. This may lead to complex changes in ecosystems and needs to be considered in planning conservation strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00174.x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Eyre, M.D. & Luff, M.L. (1991) A preliminary classification of European grassland habitats using carabid beetles. The role of ground beetles in ecological and environmental studies (ed. by N.E. Stork), pp. 227-236. Intercept Ltd, Andover, Hampshire.
  2. by R.A. Leigh & A.E. Johnston), pp. 271-285. CAB International, Wallingford.
  3. Heath, J.H. & Emmet, A.M. (1991) The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 7, Part 2. Harley Books, Colchester.
  4. Hossell, J.E., Briggs, B. & Hepburn, I.R. (2000) Climate change and UK nature conservation: a review of the impact of climate change on UK species and habitat conservation policy. Depart- ment of Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
  5. Luff, M.L. (1991) Spatial and temporal stability of carabid commu- nities in a grass/arable mosaic. In The role of ground beetles in ecological and environmental studies (ed. by N.E. Stork), pp. 191- 200. Intercept Ltd, Andover, Hampshire.
  6. Marsh T.J. (1996) The 1995 UK drought -a signal of climatic instab- ility? Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Water, Maritime and Energy, 118, 189-195.
  7. by K.J. Kirby & M.D. Morecroft), pp. 120-129. English Nature, Peterborough.
  8. Parmesan, C., Root, T.L. & Willig, M.R. (2000) Impacts of extreme weather and climate on terrestrial biota. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81, 443-450.
  9. Terrell-Nield, C.E. (1991) Distribution of leg colour morphs of Pterostichus madidus (F.) in relation to climate. The role of ground beetles in ecological and environmental studies (ed. by N.E. Stork), pp. 39-51. Intercept Ltd, Andover, Hampshire.
  10. Woiwod, I.P. & Harrington, R. (1994) Flying in the face of change: the Rothamsted Insect Survey. Long-term experiments in agricul- tural and ecological sciences (ed. by R.A. Leigh & A.E. Johnston), pp. 321-342. CAB International, Wallingford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morecroft, M. D., Bealey, C. E., Howells, O., Rennie, S., & Woiwod, I. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Morecroft, M. D.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
7-22
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W1722599945
Cited by
86
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Northern Ireland
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
drought, moths, butterflies, ground beetles, vascular plants, annual and biennial plants, grassland, species distribution, dispersal, climate change, summer temperature, soil moisture, conservation planning, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review