Cited by 529Cultural Differences and ValuesIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingChinese history and philosophy

A test of the Dual Filial Piety model

Yeh, Kuang‐Hui, Bedford, Olwen·2003·Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Filial piety is a central concept in Confucianism, containing important ideas about how children should treat their parents. Research over the past two decades has resulted in conflicting findings over whether filial piety is beneficial or harmful to individual development. The Dual Filial Piety model integrates these conflicting findings and suggests neither assessment of filial piety is appropriate. The present study offers empirical evidence in support of the dual model and offers commentary on the role of filial piety in modern Chinese society and directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1467-839x.2003.00122.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yeh and Bedford (2003) found that authoritarian filial piety (AFP) had a significant positive correlation with Neuroticism and a significant negative correlation with Openness, just as Zhang and Bond (1998) had previously found using Ho's (1994) filial piety scale.

    “Yeh and Bedford (2003) found that authoritarian filial piety (AFP) had a significant positive correlation with Neuroticism, and significant negative correlation with Openness, just as Zhang and Bond (1998) had previously found using Ho’s (1994) filial piety scale.”
  • The results of Yeh and Bedford suggest that defining filial piety solely in terms of authoritarian norms, practices, or values misses the full picture.

    “These results suggest that definition of filial piety solely in terms of authoritarian norms/practices/values misses the full picture.”
  • Yeh and Bedford also found that reciprocal filial piety (RFP) had a positive correlation with Openness and a negative correlation with Neuroticism.

    “However, Yeh and Bedford also found that reciprocal filial piety (RFP) had the opposite relation with these two personality traits. RFP had a positive correlation with Openness and a negative correlation with Neuroticism.”
  • AFP beliefs are positively associated with traditional and conservative attitudes and with maladaptation.

    “Research on junior high students and their parents in Taiwan showed that AFP beliefs are positively associated with traditional and conservative attitudes (e.g., male superiority and submission to authority; Yeh and Bedford, 2003) and maladaptation (e.g., neurotic personality traits, depression, and anxiety; Yeh, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeh, K., & Bedford, O.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University (TW)
Venue
Asian Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-14
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
215-228
ISSN
  • 1367-2223 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-839X
OpenAlex
W1602263664
Cited by
529
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asian Journal Of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
filial piety, Confucianism, parent-child relationship, child development, intergenerational relations, contemporary Chinese society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review