Cited by 7Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Parental care among only children in China: motivation, provision, and experiences

Open access
Shen, Ying, Ciobanu, Ruxandra Oana, van der Horst, Mariska, Kliegel, Matthias, van Tilburg, Theo G.·2025·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

Being the only child in the family means concentrated responsibilities for parental care. This study presents findings from 23 semi-structured interviews with Chinese only children, exploring their care motivation, provision, and experiences within the context of Chinese filial piety and social change. We developed a typology by examining how Chinese only children responded to their parents’ care needs and why they provided care (or chose not to). Four caregiver types emerged, each with distinct experiences. Wholehearted intensive caregivers generally had positive experiences, whereas obligatory intensive caregivers often had negative experiences. Partially engaged caregivers felt either content or guilty, and minimal-sufficient caregivers exhibited fewer pronounced positive or negative experiences but were concerned about parent’s future care needs. In a social context characterized by a lack of public care support and an emphasis on filial piety, the caregiving experiences of only children was influenced by whether there was alignment between their intrinsic motivations and actions, and their ability to achieve internal balance and external understanding from their social network. Being the only child profoundly impacted their care motivation, provision, and experiences. Our findings suggest that factors influencing the caregiving experiences should be considered holistically, with attention to the broader social context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02654075251346370

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, Y., Ciobanu, R. O., van der Horst, M., Kliegel, M., & van Tilburg, T. G.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Shen, Ying
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2025-05-26
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
2545-2570
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W4410734417
Cited by
7
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
CSC-VUA Scholarship (202008410223)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
only children, parental care, filial piety, caregiver motivation, caregiver experiences, Chinese family, social change, guilt, social networks, intergenerational relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review