Cited by 71Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive System and Pregnancy

The significance of crown–rump length measurement for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome of threatened abortion

Reljič, M.·2001·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To determine if in women with threatened miscarriage the measurement of fetal crown–rump length (CRL) is a useful predictor of spontaneous miscarriage and small for gestational age (SGA) infants. Methods: Fetal CRL was measured in 310 singleton pregnancies with live fetuses, presenting with threatened miscarriage before 13 weeks of gestation. The relationship between fetal CRL and pregnancy outcome was investigated. Results: In fetuses with CRL < 18 mm there was a significant positive association between the deficit in CRL for gestation and the incidence of subsequent spontaneous miscarriage. In those cases with CRL deficit more than 2 standard deriations (SDs) the incidence of miscarriage was 13.7%, whereas if the CRL was between the mean and −2 SDs the incidence of miscarriage was 8.3%. In fetuses with CRL ≥ 18 mm there was a significant positive association between the deficit in CRL for gestation and the incidence of SGA. In those cases with CRL deficit of more than 2 SD the incidence of SGA was 27.3%, whereas if the CRL was between the mean and −2 SDs the incidence of SGA was 18.9%. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the measurement of fetal CRL may be a useful predictor of spontaneous miscarriage and SGA in pregnancies with threatened miscarriage. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00370.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reljič, M.
Corresponding author
Reljič, M.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
510-512
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2020536140
Cited by
71
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
crown-rump length, threatened abortion, miscarriage, small for gestational age, adverse pregnancy outcomes, fetal growth restriction, early pregnancy, second-trimester ultrasound
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Anthropometry, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Parity, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review