Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One‐stop clinic for assessment of risk for trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks: a prospective study of 15 030 pregnancies

Open access
Bindra, R., Heath, V., Liao, A., Spencer, K., Nicolaides, K. H.·2002·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of a one‐stop clinic for assessment of risk (OSCAR) for trisomy 21 by a combination of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness and maternal serum free β‐human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A) at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Method: Screening for trisomy 21 was carried out by OSCAR in 15 030 singleton pregnancies with live fetuses at 11–14 weeks. The estimated risk for trisomy 21 was calculated, and the women were counseled regarding this risk and the option of invasive testing or expectant management. Follow‐up of the outcome of all pregnancies was carried out. The detection and false‐positive rates for different risk cut‐offs were calculated. Results: Fetal NT and maternal serum free β‐hCG and PAPP‐A were successfully measured in all cases. Pregnancy outcome, including karyotype results or the birth of a phenotypically normal baby, was obtained from 14 383 cases. The median maternal age of these cases was 34 (range 15–49) years and in 6768 (47.1%) the age was 35 years or greater. The median gestation at screening was 12 (range 11–14) weeks and the median fetal crown–rump length was 64 (range 45–84) mm. The estimated risk for trisomy 21 based on maternal age, fetal NT and maternal serum free β‐hCG and PAPP‐A was 1 in 300 or greater in 6.8% (967 of 14 240) normal pregnancies, in 91.5% (75 of 82) of those with trisomy 21 and in 88.5% (54 of 61) of those with other chromosomal defects. For a fixed false‐positive rate of 5% the respective detection rates of screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age alone, maternal age and serum free β‐hCG and PAPP‐A, maternal age and fetal NT, and by maternal age, fetal NT and maternal serum biochemistry were 30.5%, 59.8%, 79.3% and 90.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Screening for trisomy 21 by a combination of maternal age, fetal NT and maternal serum biochemistry at 11–14 weeks can be provided in an OSCAR setting and is associated with a detection rate of about 90% for a false‐positive rate of 5%. Copyright © 2002 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00808.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Bindra, R., Heath, V., Liao, A., Spencer, K., & Nicolaides, K. H.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
219-225
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2172110268
Cited by
243
References
1
FWCI
22.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One‐stop clinic for assessment of risk for trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks: a prospective study of 15 030 pregnancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00808.x
The paper
Bindra, R., Heath, V., Liao, A., Spencer, K., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2002). One‐stop clinic for assessment of risk for trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks: a prospective study of 15 030 pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00808.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.