The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicenter study of first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk‐orientated two‐stage first‐trimester screening
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21 by a combination of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency (NT) and maternal serum free β‐human chorionic gonadotropin (β‐hCG) and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A). In addition, the potential impact of a new individual risk‐orientated two‐stage approach to first‐trimester screening was examined. Methods: First‐trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 was carried out in 75 821 singleton pregnancies with live fetuses at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 gestational weeks. The detection and false‐positive rates for different risk cut‐offs were calculated. To examine the potential impact of an individual risk‐orientated two‐stage approach to first‐trimester screening it was assumed that, after first‐trimester combined screening, chorionic villus sampling (CVS) would be performed in all patients with a risk estimate of 1 in 100 or more and in none of those with a risk estimate of less than 1 in 1000. Those in the intermediate‐risk category, with a risk estimate of between 1 in 101 and 1 in 1000, would have further assessment of risk by first‐trimester ultrasound examination to determine presence/absence of the nasal bone, presence/absence of tricuspid regurgitation or normal/abnormal Doppler velocity waveform in the ductus venosus, and CVS would be performed if their adjusted risk became 1 in 100 or more. Results: Fetal NT and maternal serum free β‐hCG and PAPP‐A were successfully measured in all cases. The median maternal age was 31 (range, 13–49) years, the median gestation at screening was 12 (range, 11 + 0 to 13 + 6) weeks and the median fetal crown–rump length was 62 (range, 45–84) mm. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 544 pregnancies, including 325 cases of trisomy 21. The estimated risk for trisomy 21 was 1 in 300 or greater in 5.2% of normal pregnancies, in 92.6% of those with trisomy 21, in 88.5% of those with trisomy 18 or 13 and in 85.6% of those with other chromosomal defects. The detection rates for trisomy 21 were about 75% and 80% for respective false‐positive rates of 1% and 2%. In the proposed individual risk‐orientated two‐stage screening for a risk cut‐off of 1 in 100 the total false‐positive rate would vary with the method used for the second stage of screening from 2.1% for absence of the nasal bone to 2.7% for increased impedance in the ductus venosus and 2.7% for tricuspid regurgitation and the respective detection rates would be 92.0%, 94.2% and 91.7%. Conclusions: First‐trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 is associated with a detection rate of about 90% for a false‐positive rate of 5%. Individual risk‐orientated two‐stage screening for trisomy 21 can potentially identify, in the first trimester of pregnancy, more than 90% of affected fetuses for a false‐positive rate of 2–3%. Copyright © 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitzpatrick, Shortall, Sculpher, Murray, Morris, Lodge, Dawson, Carr, Britton, & Briggs (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2200 · Cited by 969
RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMEN
Tabor, A., Madsen, M., Obel, E., Philip, J., Bang, J., & Gaard-Pedersen, B. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91218-3 · Cited by 869
Spencer, K., Souter, V., Tul, N., Snijders, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1999) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13040231.x · Cited by 568
Self-citationAbsence of nasal bone in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks of gestation: an observational study
Cicero, S., Curcio, P., Papageorghiou, A., Sonek, J., & Nicolaides, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06709-5 · Cited by 527
Self-citationMaternal age‐ and gestation‐specific risk for trisomy 21
Snijders, R. J. M., Sundberg, K., Holzgreve, W., Henry, G., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1999) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13030167.x · Cited by 367
Self-citationScreening for chromosomal abnormalities at 10–14 weeks: the role of ductus venosus blood flow
Matias, A., Gomes, C., Flack, N., Montenegro, N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1998) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060380.x · Cited by 318
Self-citationSpencer, K., Spencer, C. E., Power, M., Dawson, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2003) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x · Cited by 305
Self-citationBindra, R., Heath, V., Liao, A., Spencer, K., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2002) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00808.x · Cited by 243
Self-citationLikelihood ratio for trisomy 21 in fetuses with absent nasal bone at the 11–14‐week scan
Cicero, S., Rembouskos, G., Vandecruys, H., Hogg, M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2004) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.992 · Cited by 192
Self-citationSmidt-Jensen, S., Philip, J., Lundsteen, C., Permin, M., Zachary, J. M., & Fowler, S. E. (1992) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)92946-d · Cited by 189
Cited by
Kagan, K. O., Wright, D., Valencia, C., Maiz, N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den224 · Cited by 263
Self-citationMaiz, N., Valencia, C., Kagan, K. O., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6330 · Cited by 206
Self-citationKagan, K. O., Valencia, C., Livanos, P., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6264 · Cited by 175
Self-citationKagan, K. O., Cicero, S., Staboulidou, I., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6318 · Cited by 172
Self-citationProspective validation of first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21
Kagan, K. O., Etchegaray, A., Zhou, Y., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6412 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolaides, K. H., Spencer, K., Avgidou, K., Faiola, S., & Falcon, O.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-25
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-226
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2131037108
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 36.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter study of first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk‐orientated two‐stage first‐trimester screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.1860
- The paper
- Nicolaides, K. H., Spencer, K., Avgidou, K., Faiola, S., & Falcon, O. (2005). Multicenter study of first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk‐orientated two‐stage first‐trimester screening. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.