The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure
Abstract
Transgenic technology has potentially solved many of the immunological difficulties of using pig organs to support life in the human recipient. Nevertheless, other problems still remain. Knowledge of cardiac anatomy of the pig (Sus scrofa) is limited despite the general acceptance in the literature that it is similar to that of man. A qualitative analysis of porcine and human cardiac anatomy was achieved by gross examination and dissection of hearts with macrophotography. The porcine organ had a classic ‘Valentine heart’ shape, reflecting its location within the thorax and to the orientation of the pig's body (unguligrade stance). The human heart, in contrast, was trapezoidal in silhouette, reflecting man's orthograde posture. The morphologically right atrium of the pig was characterised by the tubular shape of its appendage (a feature observed on the left in the human heart). The porcine superior and inferior caval veins opened into the atrium at right angles to one another, whereas in man the orifices were directly in line. A prominent left azygous vein (comparable to the much reduced left superior caval or oblique vein in man) entered on the left side of the pig heart and drained via the coronary sinus. The porcine left atrium received only 2 pulmonary veins, whereas 4 orifices were generally observed in man. The sweep between the inlet and outlet components of the porcine right ventricle was less marked than in man, and a prominent muscular moderator band was situated in a much higher position within the porcine right ventricle compared with that of man. The apical components of both porcine ventricles possessed very coarse trabeculations, much broader than those observed in the human ventricles. In general, aortic‐mitral fibrous continuity was reduced in the outlet component of the porcine left ventricle, with approximately two‐thirds of the aortic valve being supported by left ventricular musculature. Several potentially significant differences exist between porcine and human hearts. It is important that these differences are considered as the arguments continue concerning the use of transgenic pig hearts for xenotransplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The generation of transgenic pigs as potential organ donors for humans
Cozzi, E., & White, D. J. G. (1995) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0995-964 · Cited by 602
Swine in cardiovascular research.
Hughes, H. C. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 278
WEAVER, M. E., PANTELY, G. A., BRISTOW, J. D., & LADLEY, H. D. (1986) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/20.12.907 · Cited by 247
Douglas, W. R. (1972) · Space Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00928167 · Cited by 227
Architecture of atrial musculature in humans.
Wang, K., Ho, S. Y., Gibson, D. G., & Anderson, R. H. (1995) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.73.6.559 · Cited by 201
Self-citationXenografting: probability, possibility, or pipe dream?
White, D. J., & Wallwork, J. L. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)91939-j · Cited by 44
Functional morphology of the pig sinoatrial node
Opthof, T., JONGE, B., Jongsma, H. J., & Bouman, L. N. (1987) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2828(87)80532-1 · Cited by 41
The QRS electrocardiogram, epicardiogram, vectorcardiogram and ventricular excitation of swine
Hamlin, R. L. (1960) · American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content · doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.198.3.537 · Cited by 24
Cited by
Pauza, D. H., Skripka, V., Pauziene, N., & Stropus, R. (2000) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/1097-0185(20000801)259:4<353::aid-ar10>3.0.co;2-r · Cited by 433
Bioengineering human myocardium on native extracellular matrix
Guyette, J. P., Charest, J. M., Mills, R. W., Jank, B. J., Moser, P. T., Gilpin, S. E., Gershlak, J. R., Okamoto, T., Gonzalez, G., Milan, D. J., et al. (2016) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.306874 · Cited by 343
Deletion of the α(1,3)galactosyl transferase (GGTA1) gene and the prion protein (PrP) gene in sheep
Denning, C., Burl, S., Ainslie, A., Bracken, J., Dinnyes, A., Fletcher, J., King, T., Ritchie, M., Ritchie, W. A., Rollo, M., et al. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/89313 · Cited by 273
Guidelines for animal exercise and training protocols for cardiovascular studies
Poole, D. C., Copp, S. W., Colburn, T. D., Craig, J. C., Allen, D. L., Sturek, M., O’Leary, D. S., Zucker, I. H., & Musch, T. I. (2020) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00697.2019 · Cited by 139
Schomberg, D. T., Tellez, A., Meudt, J. J., Brady, D. A., Dillon, K. N., Arowolo, F. K., Wicks, J., Rousselle, S. D., & Shanmuganayagam, D. (2016) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623315618292 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- CRICK, S. J., SHEPPARD, M. N., HO, S. Y., GEBSTEIN, L., & ANDERSON, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 193
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-119
- ISSN
- 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7580
- OpenAlex
- W2115832656
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19310105.x
- The paper
- CRICK, S. J., SHEPPARD, M. N., HO, S. Y., GEBSTEIN, L., & ANDERSON, R. H. (1998). Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure. Journal of Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19310105.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.